As long as it is tasty, I do not care how it got that way!! If it upsets the tree huggers, that is a bonus!!
2007-11-18 11:53:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by fire4511 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I saw that KFC and many other fast food chains, and even the farms they get their meat from were being cruel, and Yes I did stop eating chicken all together. What's the difference if you are going to eat the chicken anyway? My sense of self decency as a human.
2007-11-18 22:13:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by heather c 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I was boycotting KFC until they got rid of the trans fat. They were being cruel to us. How cruel can you be to dead chicken that's delivered three times a week?
2007-11-18 22:02:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Koukalaka 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
No, because they're already dead when KFC gets them (probably from Tysons). Also, the more chickens they sell the more cows are spared.
2007-11-18 19:52:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by BigRedRockEater 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
I would love to answer this honestly and I would love to say yes. I don't like cruelty to anything, but if I were very, very, very hungry and the only fast food joint avail. were KFC, I might be tempted to eat there in spite of their unkind behavior. I admit it, I am a sh-t!
2007-11-18 19:57:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by sky64 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
so its ok to eat them but not be cruel. whats the difference
2007-11-18 19:51:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by David G 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
It would mean nothing if I boycotted KFC because I never eat that junk anyway.
2007-11-18 19:50:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by heart o' gold 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
well i boycott it everyday,never been their in my life and i dont intend on ever going.NEVER ate chicken in my life and never will.
2007-11-18 19:51:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by alcaholicdemon 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes. I wouldn't buy anything there.
2007-11-22 12:36:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by THe CW 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
depending on your definition of cruel
2007-11-19 15:18:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by hitchnj 6
·
0⤊
2⤋