English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

From there are two government-led official investigations on the JFK assasination, the committes concluded that the assasination is solely carried out by Lee Harvey Oswald.

I assume most of you reading this may have watched at least once either Discovery Channel or History Channel shows of investigating the JFK assasination.

I, an enthusiastic investigator of the JFK assasination, have contacted incredible amount of information on this affiar.

I will not go into detail on this. But there is one mystery still unsolved- even by today.

Let's exclude all the other issues-motives, plans, etc. Let's just focus on the assassination itself.

If Oswald was the only gunner at the scene, shooting the president at the back, then why does the famous Zapruder film show the president being shot at the front of the head?

Seeing is believing. Here is the film.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ef5fa0e9d7

Same video, but different website: http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=kennedy%20assassination&search=Search&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&spell=1

Clearly, the last fatal head shot was fired from in front of the president, not at the back of the president, where Oswald was known to be shooting.

If you closely observe the film of the moment when the president gets shot in the head, the bullet came from the front of the president. It is proven by

1. The film clearly shows the president is getting shot in the front forehead, foolproof. You can clearly see the wound at the president's front head, as the bullet strikes.

2. the president's head flips back as the force applied to the target.

3. Also, at the moment of the impact to the target (JFK's head), the blood splash tells us the bullet entered from the front of the president's head. Throughout the entire shooting time, Oswald was at the BACK of the president.

(by the way, just before the headshot, the president was shot through his throat. After a few second, Jackie asks him, "Are you okay?")


Therefore, there must be a second gun man.

Anyone who has shot a gun before, should be able to understand what I am talking about.

I am not saying Oswald is innocent. I am saying there is a possiblity that Oswals was one of the shooters at the scene. (Or, Oswald may have not shot him at all.) Because Oswals was also assasinated before going into a further interrogation, this affair remains mystery.

But one thing for sure; I am confident there was another gunman.

If you would like to leave any opinions, you are welcomed. But no insult, profanity and attacking the other users, please!

2007-11-18 09:12:35 · 4 answers · asked by davegesprek 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

One thing I never understand is, why this foolproof, simple and obvious evidence was never brought up to the governmental investigators and be CONFRONTED?

Show this film- the moment of the headshot- to the firearms experts; hunters, the military or law enforcement experienced people. They will all agree the shot came from the front of the president!

And why does the governmental investigation committes insist on Oswald's sole act, while there is a crystal clear evidence that there is another gunman?

2007-11-18 09:12:58 · update #1

4 answers

I grew up around guns, and I have even done a bit of target practice. Never hunted, though.

I agree with you 100%! JFK was shot from the front. Anyone who argues otherwise is a fool. Thus, the logical conclusion is that there was more than one gunman, and more than one gun, used. Thus, two shooters (or more). However, this fact does not mean that we will ever be able to research just who might have been the second gunman. Anyone's guess is as good as mine. I really liked the X-files episode where it theorizes that JFK could have been shot from a nearby storm drain. Entertainment and imagination carry one far into the realm of possiblities, but no matter, this one will never die. Jack the Ripper is still the sujbect of best-selling books even today 118 years after the murder of Mary Kelley. A hundred years from now, people will still wonder just who might have shot JFK.

2007-11-18 12:15:55 · answer #1 · answered by correrafan 7 · 1 0

Oswald killed Kennedy in the act of shooting the wrong person. The other government official in the car was the Secretary of the Navy who approved Oswald's Undesirable Discharge from the Marine Corps Reserve for leaving the U.S. without advanced permission from Headquarters, Marine Corps. Six weeks before the event in Dealey Plaza, Oswald shot at retired Army General Edwin J. Walker. He was the military official who signed the certification of Oswald's discharge papers being transferred from the military official mail system to a diplomatic pouch when he (Walker) was serving as Commander, U.S Forces Berlin.
Some twenty minutes to a half hour after the shooting from the Sixth Floor Book Depository, a Dallas police officer exited his vehicle and yelled: "Hey. Oswald!". He knew Oswald because that police officer had certified delivery of the discharge papers to Oswald in person at the Marine Security Guard Detachment of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. The police officer was a Marine Corps clerk at the time. His name is J.D. Tippett.
There was one gunman. Over a period of several weeks he shot at the three men whose names were on the paperwork which discharged him from his beloved Marine Corps with a bad discharge. He missed one, wounded another and killed the third. Kennedy was an innocent bystander!

2007-11-18 11:04:25 · answer #2 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 1 0

Also of interest is the fact that the Jeb Magruder film seems to have been doctored. For those who ask why we wonder? I would give the quote. "Those who do not remember History are doomed to repeat it".

2007-11-18 10:15:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anne2 7 · 1 0

Why, nearly 45 years after the incident is it still such a hot topic of debate? Both parties are dead, end of story.

2007-11-18 09:21:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers