meaning, what does america do.... use a nuke first? or try a half @ss military advancement. (obiously politics wont work with mr.amedinajhad (sp))
2007-11-18 04:00:55 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We probably won't have to do anything right away. Israel will initiate action within the next 6-8 months to destroy Iran's centrifuges. It's sad how some people think that we cannot attack any hostile country until they have attacked us first. They view war as requiring playground rules. Waiting for a nuclear attack from Iran would be absolutely ridiculous before taking action to stop them.
2007-11-18 09:25:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, a pre-emptive nuclear strike on iran would likely result in world war 3 - ie with china and russia - not to mention economic effects - it would basically be the dumbest thing imaginable
edit
stop living in a dream world - Israel will do nothing, because we won't let them - We are not risking $200 barrel oil
2007-11-18 17:19:44 · answer #2 · answered by PD 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fighting fire with fire would mean that we get nukes too. But wait, don't we already have nukes?
2007-11-18 18:35:10 · answer #3 · answered by yutsnark 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How the hell did america get so damned unstable?
Hand the keys to your country over to the UN to run before you do damage to yourself and others..
2007-11-18 17:21:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!
We don't want to fight them with fire. We don't want them just barbequed or roasted, we want their entire country turn into a gigantic radioactive grand canyon. Lets use our nukes, "launch 'em if you got 'em".
2007-11-18 18:02:48 · answer #5 · answered by jello 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
has Iran ever attacked America ?
2007-11-18 17:11:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋