He backed Rummy, Gonzales, said that Putin was a soul mate, is tight with the Saudis and has a soft spot for Musharraf in Pakistan.
His batting average is pretty low.
2007-11-18 03:40:29 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I really think its his advisors. If all your Advisors give you bad information and you are incapable of analysing facts yourself then this is the result. If you dont have the proper info to make a sound decision then even if you have good judgement you will make a bad choice.
2007-11-19 00:57:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope. Ex intercourse is super, regardless of the shown fact that that is in straightforward terms for once you parted on amicable words by potential of mutual settlement. in case you have nonetheless love the different individual, different than as a chum, that is soliciting for hassle. i does no longer say love is a deadly flaw, at ll, regardless of the shown fact that it may carry approximately undesirable judgment i assume. the factor is that it potential you haven't any longer moved on, and you would be attempting to re-easy some thing that's no longer mutual anymore i think of. each and every individual's different. it must be merely what you need to paintings issues out,who knows. yet i might say in 9999 situations out of 10000, it could be an exceptionally undesirable theory to attach with an ex you're no longer over yet.
2016-11-12 00:21:08 · answer #2 · answered by caton 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it bad judgement or a chronic inability to admit mistakes.
BTW I found a new rightie talking point "Bush went two terms without getting impeached"
Isn't that like praising a 30 year for using the potty? What does it have to do with anything -except to serve as yet another bucket of dirt to muddy the waters and keep us from talking about Bush's utter incompetecnce?
2007-11-18 03:51:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
The whole Bush family are International Corporate Fascist tools. They are the face without a body or a brain.
2007-11-18 04:01:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Here is another judgement of his waiting to be the next big issue in the world.. http://in.news.yahoo.com/071118/48/6ne6n.html
2007-11-18 03:51:07 · answer #5 · answered by Think Sane 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush a moron, with too many fatal flaws to count and not an ounce of morality.
2007-11-18 03:52:42 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I wouldn't call it fatal. He is a two term President. The last time a Dem served 2 terms and wasn't impeached was FDR.
2007-11-18 03:46:41 · answer #7 · answered by booman17 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No. George W's fatal flaw is himself.
2007-11-18 03:54:58 · answer #8 · answered by Kinakin Kid 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
no.... i think it's his inability to self-reflect on his in-competencies and flaws as the most important leader in the world!!!!!!!
2007-11-18 03:50:15 · answer #9 · answered by nomames 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
One of many.
2007-11-18 03:53:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋