English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Turkey has a limit of 7.5 days, and Turkey is often (justly) citicised for it's human rights record.

2007-11-18 02:48:20 · 10 answers · asked by cymry3jones 7 in News & Events Current Events

Well, yes, Turkey does have problems with Muslim terrorists and I don't think the UK would stand up to close and independent examination of interrogation methods.
I'm not praising Turkey, just stating facts.

2007-11-18 03:23:58 · update #1

10 answers

If they have enough evidence to arrest someone for suspected terrorism, I think 28 days to collate the evidence should surely be enough.

2007-11-18 12:34:50 · answer #1 · answered by blackgrumpycat 7 · 0 0

Perhaps the people who object to this proposed extension of detention have very short memories which is surprising if they live in the UK.
The front line available to all of us regarding the terrorist threats.(Yes they do exist still)are the intelligence services, police,and others.
If these officers consider they do not have time to study all matter relating to the incarceration of any, person suspected of activities detrimental to the security of this country and it citizens,they should for have the option to implement the 28 days.My feeling is, if that 28days is not enough, then extend that again, until they fully establish the facts to their satisfaction.Whoever disagrees with their request is living in a fantasy world. Continue along that route and we could be reaping a whirlwind.

2007-11-18 09:54:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

a similar as the different suspected criminal. You both have rules and use them, or yuo do not. in case you imprison someone for 28 days with out something better than suspicion, you may want to do what you want to them for the duration of that factor to get a "confession" out of them. Witness the Birmingham 6 etc

2016-10-24 10:54:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

28 days is long enough if they want it any longer it should be possible for them to apply to the House of Lords Law Committee and the onus must be on the authorities to prove the necessity on a week to week basis for 1 week and then release. We have already had one example of an abuse of power when the police waited until last minute to charge

2007-11-18 03:10:01 · answer #4 · answered by Scouse 7 · 2 0

perhaps 7.5 days is long enough if you torture your suspects into admission - just a thought............linking the human rights allegations to the timescale given..........

i heard that there has only been one instance where someone in UK has been held for the full 28 days...........it is available should it be required

Kamran - in the 1970's in NI they had internment which was imprisonment for as long as was required - well in excess of 28 days...............

2007-11-18 02:54:34 · answer #5 · answered by Tequila.... 7 · 2 0

Yes but do they have a threat from Muslim terrorists ? NO!

2007-11-18 02:52:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

At least give the full picture will you...

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/01/18/turkey12220.htm

2007-11-18 02:53:59 · answer #7 · answered by Simmo 4 · 0 0

28 Days is long enough, it wasn't needed during the IRA days and will not be needed today

2007-11-18 02:54:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I agree with Michele S, and I think we should use internment again.
Also the IRA did not use suicide bombers.

2007-11-18 03:26:34 · answer #9 · answered by Moses 2 · 1 0

arnold scwatsenigger dont no year or who else in it maybe gabriel byrne as devil i think hope it helps

2007-11-18 02:59:12 · answer #10 · answered by sexy bastard 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers