Do you think that the WTC / 9/11 was an inside job of the US government?

Question

why...why not?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2482741646574210449&total=29&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=4

absolutely 100%

Answer 1

whats that smell ? sniff ,sniff....I smell sheeple! more money was spent on investigating Clinton's b.j. than the 9/11 report for starters . Isn't it just a wild coincidence that the pentagon and air force were running war games that morning called "vigilant guardian" that dealt with hijacked planes.Initially dismissed as an internet rumor,about a year later the pentagon reluctantly admitted to it.And why did bush refuse to testify before the 9/11 commission. and only met with them behind closed doors at the whitehouse and what he and cheney said was not to be recorded or transcribed.
google it , don't take me at my word.

Answer 2

No it was not an "inside job"

Some people think it's possible that it was an "inside job" because our government has lied to us before.

However, there's a huge difference between lying (which everyone does), and committing the biggest, most evil, traitorous mass murder in Amercian history.
------------------------
The main reasons why it was not an inside job:

OVERWHELIMNG SCIENCE AGAINST THE CONSPIRACY
--Every single published expert (in demolition or civil engineering) in the world has rejected the so-called "science" of the conspiracy theorists. It's really amazing.

LACK OF A MOTIVE THAT MAKES SENSE
-- Why would Bush (or whoever) take such a risk as doing 9/11 when he could make all the money he wants by: receipt of lobbying, giving himself options, awarding pork barrel contracts, getting kickbacks, etc., etc.

SECRECY
--As they say, 3 people can keep a secret IF 2 of them are dead. So many people would have to be involved that someone should have come forward by now. At least one single, solitary person MUST leak, even if accidently, SOMETHING.

KNOWN KILLERS
--Al-Qaeda is the self-admitted agent with documented motives. In 1993, they attacked the WTC using a truck bomb and they were behind the attack on the US in Mogadishu. In 1996, Bin Laden issued a fatwa (basically a declaration of war) against the United States. In 2000 al-Qaeda bombed the missile destroyer U.S.S. Cole near Yemen, killing 17 servicemen. They bombed trains in London and Spain, and have been active in Algeria, Somalia and Kenya, Pakistan, etc, etc. The 20th terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui, admitted guilt in court.

VAGUENESS OF THE PERPETRATOR
--The conspiracy theorists never say exactly who is behind the 9/11 inside job. This is a sign that the claim is false.

The conspiracists are afraid to name a specific person because then we could examine that person & instantly prove the conspiracy people wrong. So, they hide behind vagueness.
===============================
Here are some easily refuted conspiracy arguments.

NO WALL STREET PROFIT MAKING WAS FOUND ON 9/11

One of the first things the FBI did was check for profiteering from 9/11. This is easy to do because details of all financial transactions are a matter of public record.

Upon inspection, no such transactions occurred to any meaningful extent. See Point 6, at:
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=August&x=20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355

Financial transactions are not anonymous & anyone profitting from 9/11 would be instantly discovered. Truth is, no such profitting happened. As usual, it's just a made-up "fact."

THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 IS NOT SURPRISING

The fact that WTC7 collapsed even though it wasn’t hit by the planes is not surprising.

Even though they were NOT hit by the jets, numerous buildings over a wide area were hit by debris from the collapsing towers and were destroyed.

This includes: The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_attack#Damage

As for WTC 7:
According to NIST "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." See http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7

THE TOWERS DID NOT FALL DOWN BECAUSE OF FIRE ALONE

The main reason they fell was because the jets knocked out numerous support columns; the fires only helped.

Therefore, the claim that “no other towers ever fell down due to fire alone” is irrelevant.
(It’s also false since the Windsor Building in Madrid collapsed from fire alone on 2/12/2005)

Note: The towers fell because of STRUCTURAL DAMAGE, plus fire.

As NIST (National Institute of Science & Technology) says:
"About 60% of the 60 columns of the impacted face of framed-tube were severed, and many more were significantly deflected. “

The remaining supports had to hold up about 200,000 tons and were near the failure point. Meanwhile, the raging fire started weakening these remaining supports. (Steel loses half its strength at 600 deg C. Melting is not necessary nor did it occur)

The horizontal supports sagged downward & slowly pulled in the perimeter columns.

Many photographs of the towers show the exterior columns bending inward, a sign that the towers were doomed & also excellent proof that, without question, the jets alone caused the collapse.

The exterior columns then snapped inward & collapse ensued.

See the lead investigator from NIST explain how the buildings collapsed at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
(Click on “Impact to collapse” )

Answer 3

I don't think that anyone in government arranged it, or put explosives in the building, as if often claimed. I think that our foreign policy was geared toward provoking some sort of major terrorist attack on our nation. This was the excuse for the police state measure, allegedly to "protect us from terrorism".

I know that there was prior knowledge of the Murrah Building bombing. That is really no secret at this point. All the names of those involved are well documented: the "Reverend" Robert Millar who planned it (supposedly a "federal informant"), Andreas Strassmeir, a German national who came to the US looking for a job with the CIA or DEA. He is the man McVeigh was trying to call at the Elohim City Neo-Nazi camp. Michael Brescia, who has been described as "John Doe number two. There was Carol Howe, a real government informant. She informed her handler Angela Finley about the planned attack on the Murrah Building.

The reason so many Americans believe it was an inside job is because we have caught our politicians in so many lies. We know that they use agents provacateur to blow up things and commit other criminal acts. They conceal evidence under the guise of "national security".

The typical law enforcement agent is a patriotic American. It is at the top of these organization we find the criminals. They are the ones who order attacks on groups that they have demonized. Their targets are either groups that are politically incorrect, or they may actually be involved in illegal activity. These attacks are used to intimidate Americans by showing them what could happen to them if they cross our "masters". This use of implied threat to compel people to refrain from activity that is not in itself illegal has a definition. It is terrorism.

Any group that uses force or the threat of force to influence the behavior of an individual or group, that is not in itself illegal, is guilty of terrorism.

Another reason that so many Americans believe that this was an inside job is government secrecy. In a free state, government has very few secrets. The people can see government operations. It is the people's privacy that is protected.

In the totalitarian state, it is government who hides information under the guise of "national security". This same government whats to know the citizen's private affairs, to "protect us from terrorism".

Read the Bill of Rights, and then look at what is happening today in Washington. It makes you want to vote for Ron Paul, doesn't it?

Answer 4

Hmmm... let's evauluate...

1. Bush wanted to go to war with Iraq BEFORE 9/11.

2. There were several Wall Street /financial scandals around that time (the evidence for which was in WTC 7, which "fell" even though no plane struck it).

3. Only three skyscrapers have ever "fell down" due to fire in the history of the planet... and they all happened on 9/11

4. America DID NOT kill Osama Bin Laden, who's family has ties to President Bush... But America DID manage to capture and kill Saddam, whom Bush had been targeting all along.

Isn't strange how anytime America "needs" to go to war with someone, we get attacked?

If you know (a) the government was lying about it's intent to go to war with Iraq, (b) it was linked to people who were caught up in scandals and would benefit from the evidence of those scandals "burning up", (c) and was warned of the 9/11 attacks but did nothing... you can see why Bush didn't seem too worried about things when he was reading to those school kids and they told him that we were under attack...

It's a no-brainer... He already knew.

Answer 5

Oh for Pete's Sake.....No the government is not involved in something like that. The people in the government have families and they themselves live in this country, why on earth would they do something like that? What could they possibly gain?
I'm not ancient but never in my lifetime have I ever had to struggle financially like my family is having to now. Granted I know the people in the government make quite a bit more than we do but come on there is no way they would put themselves through what the people of our country are going through now on purpose.
Why...do you think they did?

Answer 6

It's funny how so many people want to believe Bush lied, when it was Clinton's CIA who came up with the WMD information. Elect Hillary, and we'll get to see it again.

Answer 7

No. I do have a shred of pride left im my government.
Or a shred of Brain Washing in my mind from when I used to believe the newspapers.

Time will tell.

Answer 8

yes, but it was was carried out by the gloabal zionist network.

Much of the suppressed evidence point s to it e.g. ‘five dancing Israelis’ who were arrested on the day, the Mossad front " Urban Moving Systems" who were working on the WTC from the time that radical Zionist Sliverstein bought it from the NY port authority, the Israeli 'Odigo' paging company who warned its clients not to go in on 9/11, the 200 Israeli "art students" deported on visa violations and who company vans tested positive for explosives, all on the orders of HSA chief dual Israeli national Michael 'Mossad' Chertoff,

Answer 9

You answered your own question when you said "why...why not?"

I can't think of any valid reason why our government would do this. I also don't believe that they could pull off something that big and keep it all secret.

Answer 10

If popular mechanics says its not then I guess they are right, everyone else is just a kook it seems.