English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Nov 17,2007
IAEA Again Verifies Iranian Compliance
The International Atomic Energy Agency has, once again, verified "the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran." It seems the Iranians continue to provide the IAEA access to all "special nuclear materials" – as proscribed by the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons – and all relevant nuclear material accountancy reports, as well as access to all activities involving said materials.Nowhere in the IAEA report does Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei even suggest that Iran has missed a "key deadline" previously agreed to by Iran and the IAEA. Furthermore, far from complaining about "incomplete disclosures," ElBaradei reported that Iran has provided "sufficient access" to individuals, and has "responded in a timely manner" to questions, and provided "clarifications and amplifications" on issues raised in the context of the "work plan."

2007-11-18 01:38:52 · 5 answers · asked by rare2findd 6 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

Do you remember when President Bush told the world through a speech the media covered and said God Spoke to him.

As a voter we should have had him institutionalized right then and there.
I'm serious do you believe anyone when they say God spoke to them.

2007-11-18 01:58:41 · answer #1 · answered by man of ape 6 · 1 2

You are making a subjective judgment based on the opinions of others and as such it is no more correct and no less correct than the subjective opinions of other people.

Fact: Iran supported terrorists who attacked the US Embassy and took people hostage.

Fact: Iranian government has made statements of the effect that two of their national goals are the destruction of the United States and the destruction of Israel.

Fact: Iran is currently funding/supplying and training terrorists in Iraq.

Those are facts. Your report of "ElBaradei's sufficient access" alone is a report of a subjective opinion.

As far as I am concerned Tehran would look much better as a glassy pool of molten, radioactive sand.

2007-11-18 10:02:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Saddam had WMD`s you moron.... He use them twice,what other evidence do you need. OK here is your report.....Saddam had WMD...Sorces.-BIll Clinton ,Al Gore, Harry Ried, John Kerry,Joe Biden plus 95% of all Democrats...Keep in mind this was even before Bush had ran for president. Lies, you on the far left has to blame someone to cover up Clinton`s lack of response to UN inspeactors being kicked out of Iraq some how....It`s very easy....Blame it on someone who was not even there..Your media will buy it

2007-11-18 09:50:26 · answer #3 · answered by charlie s 5 · 2 2

It is similar to the NIE that suggested yellowcake in Iraq; all of it is to gain political support which makes it more rhetoric than an intelligence report.
Like rhetoric, it is a facade.

2007-11-18 09:42:25 · answer #4 · answered by Professor Sheed 6 · 1 2

Gullible loser with an agenda.

2007-11-18 09:41:47 · answer #5 · answered by Doc 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers