2007-11-18 01:28:32 · 7 answers · asked by Moses 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
yes
it is totally ridiculous
- a murderer cannot be removed from this country because he has 'the right' to family life - what about the family of his victim?
terror suspects, murderers and rapists who are illegal immigrants cannot be sent home - they might have a hard time in their own countries - they were probably evil b***** there as well, their human rights might be violated .........hard luck - better they are out of this country (as they have no right to be here) than to risk one person from UK
2007-11-18 01:56:19 · answer #1 · answered by Tequila.... 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think it should be re-jigged so that the Act protects the law abiding first. I feel that to much emphasis is placed on the human rights of the offender and not enough on the victim. I is right that an offender may claim protection from the law but not at the expense of his victim. Nor should we worry to much about a alien offender permitted to stay here. His offences are an abuse of hospitality and I ask what would you do if a guest abused your hospitality. I think most of us would make it very clear that that guest was no longer welcome
2007-11-18 02:15:23 · answer #2 · answered by Scouse 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
A resounding YES to this question. This has got to be the WORST bill ever passed by Labour. To be fair, it was intended to assist. But it's not helping the people it was designed to help. It's actually benefiting the law-breakers, etc more than anything else. Gordon Brown could have gained a lot of kudos getting rid of this Bill when he took over from Blair. BIG mistake keeping it, Gordie
2007-11-18 02:22:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, i believe it should as it is used to protect the aggressor more time than not, i believe that this act was implemented to protect the weaker people in our society without causing more harm to the general populace, this is now not the case as the weaker citizens have this act used against them by the offender, the act was never designed to be used in this way
2007-11-18 01:39:46 · answer #4 · answered by John W 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No but it should be amended and have a section on human responsibilities. This would stop silly rulings and mean that criminals forgoe their rights when they ignore their responsibilities
2007-11-18 01:39:53 · answer #5 · answered by Rich T 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
yes they have been more for the bad people then the one,s they should help
2007-11-18 03:29:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It should be scrapped.
2007-11-18 01:36:29 · answer #7 · answered by little weed 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋