English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Since Korea all wars America has engaged in have been for profiting the military industrial complex, under the guise of Patriotism.
I am tired of the lies, deceit, and manipulation of all war mongers.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned about the military-industrial-complex. He made reference to the dangers inherent in a system where the corporations take over the government. Man could now step on the moon, packaging and selling his footprint as a forward moving human accomplishment while at the same time, thanks to Monsanto, drop seventy-two-million liters of the sickness-causing defoliant, Agent Orange, on a nation fighting for national liberation. Man could communicate within seconds to people on the lunar surface while simultaneously destroying villages in Vietnam in order to save them. Was there any connection between space exploration and war? People stirred with the rumblings that the military-industrial-complex and the space program were one and the same. Eisenhower said,

Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

2007-11-18 01:06:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

I accept as true with all you have pronounced so a procedures. I fairly tend in the direction of dem besides yet after the final 8 years that's finished blown. we will not have the money for to proceed the provide aways to the rich on an identical time as people starve and finally end up homeless. McCain has ably conventional that he intends to proceed the bush rules and chosen a vice chairman so severe not something good might desire to probable come of it. regrettably, Obama nevertheless has not shown how he intends to truly do to make it any greater desirable any greater desirable. Had we heeded the founders warnings approximately letting political events and particular pastime team to take over the political gadget we probably does not be confronted back and back with accepting the desirable of the worst. the people now not have any voice in who runs, all it is being desperate by ability of the particular pastime communities and firms. we are merely left with attempting back to a decision which of people who're out to earnings place of work to characterize the particular pastime communities which will do the least harm to the people on an identical time as doing that. With that pronounced I many times attempt to chosen the only which will enable the poorest between us have the main crumbs.

2016-09-29 11:24:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well thats a loaded question. So instead of giving you an intelligent answer, I am going to give you the one you expect to hear coming from me. You see, I don't think your going to listen to any point I make anyway...and this will be more fun for me.

I will vote for the candidate who will not only continue the wars but will exacerbate them beyond all possible comprehension. We should just go ahead and nuke meca and medina while we are at it,and if that ends the current war we should start another one with other peaceful societies like syria.

2007-11-18 01:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by jhillftp 5 · 2 1

The one who would continue to keep our country safe and fight wars to do so. Otherwise, kiss your country goodbye.

2007-11-18 09:56:57 · answer #4 · answered by sorry sista 7 · 0 0

I will vote for the one who continues this war against islamofacism.

Health care won't mean much if 'they' win.

2007-11-18 01:28:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The one who would continue a war as long as our enemies are engaged in war against us. Stopping a war before the other side does is asking them to do their worst on us.

2007-11-18 01:06:59 · answer #6 · answered by Dan 4 · 4 4

The one who'd take responsibility for his or her actions. The one who understands that even the unintended consequences of their actions need to be answered. We pulled out of Vietnam because people whined about the price. Ultimately, the people who allied us in Vietnam paided the price with a million or so being tortured and executed after we left. Just roll over and go back to sleep. We need to finish what we've started.

2007-11-18 01:11:26 · answer #7 · answered by Doc 7 · 3 4

The one who will do the right thing and the right thing is not to bring the troops home too early. That is just plain ignorant.

2007-11-18 01:04:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

I don't care if it is Republican, Democrat, etc, this conflict in the middle east has to end soon. We are trying to fight a religion, and failing. The United States is in trouble. We need to pull back, and help ourselves. After this can we afford to help others.

2007-11-18 01:14:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

The one that would keep us safest. If that means the war continues than so be it.

2007-11-18 01:04:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8 3

fedest.com, questions and answers