Something to hide, the tests are 99.9% fact, They say they can`t understand all the bad press then release this statement like this.I`ve had my doubts about them all along abd kept an open mind but they are slowley losing credability in my eyes.
2007-11-17 19:32:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
14⤊
3⤋
Presumably she has had legal advice on that and I would be pretty surprised if she hadn't. Her lawyer would have told her that results of lie-detector tests are not admissible in English courts because they cannot be relied upon.... (people have managed to trick lie-detectors in the past). Lie detectors tell the truth, but a truth that is based on the signs the human body gives when lying. If you can fake those, you can trick the machine. --- My problem with her U-turn is this: she knows that that evidence cannot be used in court.... so WHY is she refusing to take the test ? --- Because she is lying... and refusing the lie detector is the very same thing that she has done already up to now i.e. refusing to answer those 40 questions posed by the investigators PJ-GNR.
(--- the CBS in the USA are right.... this is a "very tragic but a very compelling case" --- )
2007-11-18 06:45:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by RED-CHROME 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
She won't take one because she would never pass the test. Clarence has probably told her not to do it.
It is about time this charade is over and these two and their accomplices are brought to book. It is a sad and sorry state when you have idiots on here who are seemingly sucking up to the McCanns and to all effects, are endorsing child neglect.
As i said before, look at your own children and grandchildren then look at the bigger pictures. Do you want justice for this little girl or do you want a child killer to walk away scot free?
If you endorse the parents, then in my book you have no morals at all.
2007-11-18 04:13:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by archieis42 2
·
9⤊
2⤋
After the fiasco the media has made by twisting and turning every piece of information,w oudl you trust them?
I think the McCanns are doing a fine job, leave them alone.
2007-11-18 12:00:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Possibly because sometimes those tests are wrong, so even if she was telling the truth it may say she is lying and it's a 50/50 chance either way.
2007-11-18 10:48:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
For goodness sake get a grip, If this was an official lie detector test taken by the police or other official body then I would be suspicious at her refusal but it's not and it is far to serious a subject to resort to the type of thing that's done on the Jeremy Kyle show. Do we really want trial by media to creep into the justice system? I think not.
2007-11-18 04:33:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Empeedee 3
·
2⤊
6⤋
Oh, for godssake Kate! Blurt it out.....
Relieve yourself of the tension and stress.
It was your husband's idea to obscure the real facts.
Had it been up to you alone, you would have cracked by now.
In the Jonbenet Ramsy's case in the US, the mother got cancer and died, and took her secret to the grave....couldn't hold onto it any more. These two cases are very similar.
Now the father continues to collect mucho dollars from the media, telling the same lies, 'til he dies too.
Now, you wouldn't wish that on your 2 remaining kids, would you? Come clean, Kate!
2007-11-18 04:18:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by starling 3
·
7⤊
3⤋
Afraid of the truth coming out !
2007-11-18 09:12:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
her and her husband should take one,
who cares enough about madeline to make this couple tell the truth
all the blame should not be on kate it should be equally shared with the husband
they are both lying and they both neglected the children
2007-11-18 04:12:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by stacey 7
·
9⤊
2⤋
Because Kate MaCcann is not telling the Truth...
2007-11-18 03:55:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Smiley Heart 4
·
8⤊
2⤋