English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am not taking sides, I was just wondering what everybody thought, Thanks

2007-11-17 18:19:04 · 15 answers · asked by JarlinFo 1 in Politics & Government Government

Are people just saying these things because they don't like her of Democrats?

2007-11-17 18:26:13 · update #1

15 answers

People don't actually think that, they are just saying that to express their dislike for her political views and lies. If she was president, a lot would be messed up.

I'm a democrat and I'm not voting for her. She has lied too much and changes her views/opinions all the time. Lot's of politicians do that but she does it a lot.

** People are saying it because CNN is obsessed with her and a lot of people are sick of hearing about how she will probably win.

2007-11-17 18:22:25 · answer #1 · answered by Ruby Girl 2 · 3 1

I kissed it so long 8 years in the past while invoice Clinton turn over the reins to G.W.Bush with a balanced funds and a ten year $5.6 trillion greenback surplus of money which Bush went nonetheless in 2001 with this conflict and the recession he created. i in my opinion can not comprehend each and all of the Hilary haters at here It replaced into her option to stand by utilising her husband after his little no no (who rather cares if he have been given a BJ in the 1st place) I advantageous do not i think of human beings would desire to truly think of approximately helping a unknown and untested candidate because of the fact the nominee for the Presidency. His balloting checklist as a IL senator supplies me super concern approximately how he will govern our u . s .. His assertion that Reagan replaced into the main suitable president in the final 15 years is yet another concern and there are plenty greater. we are at conflict,we've a financial equipment it extremely is slipping right into a recession,our status in the international is in question,and lots greater and that i don't think of we would desire to constantly placed our destiny in the hands of a unknown ,no qualification,no experience ,no specifics proposals to alter our u . s ..

2016-09-30 23:41:07 · answer #2 · answered by ahhee 4 · 0 0

Hilary Clinton would love to give govt provided programs ,such as health, govt aid for minority groups etc. the only problem is , now you are 100% dependent on the government for EVERYTHING, and as soon as that happens the government owns you. I can almost guarantee, if she gets in office, she will be trying to tinker on the constitution of the united states, you know, that little part that says you have the "right to bear arms".....that was put in the constitution so that government could not get to be so powerful ,that it would be just like the government they fled from in england. hilary would love to ban guns. then, you are not only dependent on the government, you are helpless too!! Freedom of religion is why our forefathers left a monarchy England, have you noticed all the left wing attempts to erase religion from our every day life? they took the cross out of the state seal of California, banned prayer in schools, whats next burning bibles in the street?

2007-11-17 19:40:59 · answer #3 · answered by billy e 2 · 2 1

Its not everyone's thoughts is an impression the media gives people, the weeker minded people eat it up not really knowing why other than they keep hearing it over and over again, then they impress the next person and all of a sudden we have another crumby president.
VOTE RON PAUL all about the issues not about self-gain to be president

2007-11-17 18:23:49 · answer #4 · answered by howuluddat 3 · 1 2

The only dictator in this country is G.W. Bush. And while I don't support Hillary, (GO OBAMA) anyone is better the idiot in office!

2007-11-19 13:35:29 · answer #5 · answered by Physicist 2 · 0 1

Because Hillary can't give a straight answer on any issue, I don't think anyone has any worry about her winning the election....

2007-11-17 18:26:20 · answer #6 · answered by GUARD DOG 4 · 2 1

because of what happened with the last clinton..."legacy". no one but an avowed liberal extremist would think she..."wasnt involved" and ..."didnt know" its pure caa caa.
\
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-11-17 23:18:13 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 0

Misogyny. People think she's cold and bossy with out even having met her. Any woman in her position of power threatens petty, ignorant, chauvinistic men, and or ignorant women who blindly follow what they where taught to think about women. Which mainly is that there only good for housewives.

If you answer this question by calling her a bi+tch or cold you're calling yourself ignorant.

2007-11-17 18:27:28 · answer #8 · answered by zxcfghj 2 · 1 3

there are no dictatorships in the usa whomever wins will control the country and Hillary is the best choice for the poor. and all others.

2007-11-17 18:26:54 · answer #9 · answered by sheilasays 3 · 1 4

no actually we remember what happened she and Slick Willie were in office the last time.
That's why we call them the Clintonistas.

2007-11-17 18:47:53 · answer #10 · answered by CFB 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers