So, I posted this question last night, and the Yahoo Nazis took it down for some reason unbeknownst to me (especially since the story was on Yahoo news). Three black dudes break and enter a white family's home, beat their kid into permanent brain damage with a baseball bat. The home owner shoots two of the three perps dead, and the third lives. Now the "black community" is up in arms because they are charging the surviving perp with the murder of his loser cohorts. They claim racism is the motivation to charge the lucky bastard that didn't get a well-deserved slug in his head. He was in on the plan, knew he was a criminal, and perpetuated the justifiable shootings of his accomplices. Is he responsible for their deaths? I say yes. Either way, the other two got what they deserved...so he should be counting his lucky stars, if all he has to do is take broom handle molesting a few times.
2007-11-17
16:50:52
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
So, maybe his son was a drug dealer? They obviously didn't come prepared to pay, other than in the form of a baseball bat. The lucky bastard should be thankful he didn't buy the farm with his two worthless, drug-addicted, criminal, and justifiably dead accomplices. I hope he gets enough broom handles up his *** in prison, to wish he'd only been shot in the back for his crimes. What a cowardly loser.
2007-11-17
17:36:21 ·
update #1