As a non-Christian, I question my acceptable to respond to this question. in case you have a rock on your hand, there is not any longer one hundred% conclusive info that it exists. in actuality, there is not any longer one hundred% conclusive info which you exist. perhaps each and every thing that comes jointly to variety the physique, the techniques and the existence is merely area of one's very own (pre-latest) mind's eye. In different words 'i think of, for this reason i'm'. anyhow, I digress. regardless of the shown fact that, there is a few thing that I even have self assurance in now. it is not a deity, regardless of the shown fact that it is likewise some thing that I even have by no potential seen, and for this reason haven't any conclusive info of, yet I strongly have faith it exists. that is a scripture, latest in actual all of us. it is not written, and can by no potential BE written. There are merely no words that properly describe what the scripture says, as a manner to attempt and write it or talk it could be impossible. the only thank you to understand the scripture is thru all of our six human senses, maximum of all the way with the aid of feeling it. by potential of 'feeling', i'm bearing on the 6th, the 'feeling' it somewhat is autonomous of the experience of touch. there have been some human beings interior the previous who've tried to write down this scripture, however the info shows it is often mistranslated from the uncooked feeling it communicates. It can't be defined, it may in straightforward terms be prevalent. there is in straightforward terms one way of attending to know it, and that's thru love. while we discover ways to love, we've the skills to 'study' this, and all of us know it in each and every thing we see that's no longer guy-made. So who 'wrote' this scripture on our hearts and in our spirits? From my Atheistic opinion, it is an element of Nature, yet a Theist will characteristic the God(ess) they suspect in by way of fact the author. regardless of the shown fact that, by potential of understanding the scripture, it turns into glaring that there is not any count who or what produced it, in straightforward terms the message itself is significant. think of of a lecture room. each and all of the youngsters have different mothers and fathers, yet they are all there taking the comparable lesson. we are all toddlers of different deities, however the scripture to income is the comparable, and all too in many situations, most of the youngsters have forgotten the language the lesson is held in. that's the language they have been born to. an attractive question (((((((woman M))))))) Your husbunny
2016-11-11 23:26:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats an interesting assignment.
As far as I know, Odyesseus and Batman have nothing at all in common. Your English teacher is a weirdo if she assigned you that. :D
2007-11-17 15:28:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by smiley chick 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ody (odysseus) is al little cocky while batman's more discrete.............
obviously time period difference.....
Ody's married while batman isnt.
Ody has a crew while Batman likes to be indpendent (other than robin....)
oh & ody isnt married to helen of troy, hes married to PENELOPE.
umm.. those are just some off the top of my head...
2007-11-17 15:03:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♥ Confused ♥ 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
One dated Helen of Troy and one didn't? One wore a batman suit and one didn't? That's a very unusual assignment.
2007-11-17 15:00:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joe M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋