English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

CHICAGO (AFP) - Rising sea levels could swallow up to 40 percent more potable groundwater than previously thought...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071117/ts_alt_afp/usclimatewarmingresourceswater_071117180004

2007-11-17 13:45:59 · 24 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government Politics

J&C H (below) LOLOL

2007-11-17 13:54:41 · update #1

Shylock (below) "Slow motion flip-flop" LOL, I love it!

2007-11-17 13:56:45 · update #2

24 answers

I do! I do!

2007-11-17 13:50:06 · answer #1 · answered by cynical 7 · 2 2

Neo COns do not deny worldwide warming, anyhow some people. the difficulty is that there is stong debate as to the reasons. i'm a neo con who thinks that the earth has cycles. It became 30 years in the past that there became project of world cooling. 15 years in the past that there became a large entire interior the ozone over australia, however the size of the hollow has decreased in length by way of the years. The neocon debate is over reasons of world warming, not does it exist. decrease than the entire damn debate is over the reason, I accept as true with you that it won't amtter, notwithstanding i think of there's a distinction between human causallity and worldwide cycles. Jesus.

2016-09-29 10:55:36 · answer #2 · answered by lindholm 4 · 0 0

Global warming... yep just like global cooling in the 70's and early 80's. Oh yeah, it couldn't be a natural cycle... that's not even something worth looking into, and you know, we could possibly understand the cycles, cuz the world is millions of years old and we have less than 200 years true research on environment period, much less on global warming, yet they want to pretend that they KNOW already.

2007-11-17 14:35:47 · answer #3 · answered by scorch_22 6 · 0 0

They'll just denounce FOX as becoming too liberal, so they don't have to figure out what Global Warming is.

that is obvious when someone thinks a weather variation is evidence that it isn't happening just because it is getting cooler not warmer.

2007-11-17 14:01:06 · answer #4 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 4 0

As most libs, you are twisting reality. Global warming is fairly widely accepted, it is the cause that is in question. Those who were whining and wringing their hands about a coming ice age in the 70s are now relying on the same junk science with global warming. The vast majority of all "greenhouse gasses" are from natural causes, not the despicable human species. Ride mules, live in a cave and eat twigs and bark if you like, as for me, I'll keep my SUV, 3-BR home, and steak and potatoes. It's difficult for a lib to watch FOX News, but it's well worth the education.

2007-11-17 13:58:53 · answer #5 · answered by Cecil n 7 · 1 4

Bush says its real
Fox is a big supporter of Bush.

If Bush said the war in Iraq was a huge mistake, would Fox call Bush a liar?


Peace

Jim

.

2007-11-17 13:57:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Not me! It's been cold down here in Florida all week. This cold isn't supposed to happed til January.

I think the Global Warming is from blow hard liberals talking so much garbage during their debates. I swear Thursday night I felt a hot breeze pass over about 9 PM (EST)

2007-11-17 13:56:54 · answer #7 · answered by DesignDiva1 5 · 2 3

I thought Republicans have been trying to stop global warming for the last 30 years ?

They have been trying to replace the fossil fuel power plants with nuclear power plants like the IPCC says we should do.

But have been blocked by Liberals at every turn, from doing so.

So you could really say, liberals caused global warming, by blocking clean energy sources and making us rely on CO2 producing fossil fuel power plants.

2007-11-17 14:01:42 · answer #8 · answered by zooma 3 · 3 2

I'll believe it in 10,000 years when we have enough accurate data. Currently, we only have 150 years worth of data, and only the last 50 have been with accurate instruments all over the world, instead of just the industrialized world. 150 years of questionable data in the life of a 4 billion year old planet is not enough to make any kind of accurate deductions from.
There is also the fact that CO2 is only 1 of many thousands of variables that effect the climate. Most of which, including the largest (the sun) we have absolutely no control over.
Global Warming is a myth based on virtually no accurate data.

2007-11-17 13:53:50 · answer #9 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 1 5

I accept reality of global warming today. buying up land in canada and greenland. you know were lush vegitation grew for decades when the earth was hotter before industrialization. Ill sell it to you for 500% profit right before the cycle changes again.

2007-11-17 13:52:02 · answer #10 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 4 2

no, but if Rush gives the OK, then global warming is fact

of course NYC could go under water and you'll still hear denial from him

2007-11-17 13:55:38 · answer #11 · answered by PD 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers