First of all, you might take the somewhat archaic approach that our Founders did, and that is that everyone everywhere has the same Rights, and the difference is that in America, the government was founded my people that understood that the purpose of government is to protect those Rights. (That's all in the Declaration of Independence).
You'll have to be careful in correcting your teacher diplomatically, but you can make a much better essay if you start from reality rather than your teacher's misconception. The reality is that every human being possesses these Rights, they do NOT flow from government; if they did, they would not be "Rights".
From there you can discuss the Rights that were enumerated in the Constitution, most of which are notably absent in most of the world, and under attack from one party or the other here. At any rate, the Bill of Rights (first ten amendments to the Constitution) is your list of Rights to discuss.
2007-11-17 14:20:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by open4one 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Regarding Afghanistan... while the man or woman who's liable for terrorist assaults on U.S. soil, is dwelling in Afghanistan, sure, the U.S. has a correct to move in and bomb the tar out of those people who are assisting and abetting the the responsible one. It in order that occurred that bombing the tar out of the taliban occurred to additionally support a exceptional many oppressed Afghanis. Iraq: Actually, there have been many Iraqi expats who had been hoping very so much that the U.S. might cross in and intrude. The indisputable fact that Hussein kicked the U.N. out 6 years earlier to our stepping into, was once purpose ample to move in... SINCE the stipulations of chickening out from Iraq integrated letting the U.N. track guns growth in Iraq - with dire penalties resulting, if the U.N. had been to be kicked out. Iraq was once past due dire penalties by way of 6 years. Iran: In 1979, Ahmadinejad was once some of the hostage takers for the period of that yr's hostage quandary on the American embassy. For that purpose, AMerica has saved a always cautious eye in this guy, who isn't president/dictator of Iran... and much more of a cautious eye, considering the fact that he has already promised to "punish" Israel and has expressed want to wipe them off the map. America is NOT interfering in Iran, but... simply preserving a cautious eye on them. For well purpose.
2016-09-05 07:53:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by dassler 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Girl is raped. Gets 200 lashes and jail time for being in presence of men not related to her. Happened in Saudi Arabia.
Could go the route of right to associate. Womens rights. ... ???
Not sure. Just an idea. Read the story a couple days ago and was disturbed by it. Hope it sparks some ideas.
2007-11-17 13:52:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Martin M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Americans dont have a right to travel to Cuba, and as for third world countries having less freedom...ha.. the most free country in the world is one of the poorest India. you can directly curse at the president.
2007-11-17 13:52:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Neo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No question is a dumb question. But any third world country basically. Jamaica, Barbados, Guyana etc.
2007-11-17 13:49:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You could check www.humanrightswatch.org and www.amnestyinternational.org for information on human rights violations in other countries.
2007-11-17 14:10:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by STUDENT001 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have the right to throw people into offshore jails without charges
2007-11-17 13:49:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋