Good point and well 'said'.
BUUUUUUUT !! - You gotta realize that the neo-con 'religious
fundamentalist Christian right' will villify Clinton for his 'immoral' actions, and at the same time defend Bush for creating so much wealth for them and for BEING one of them(he IS).
Those of this 'group' who are not 'well off' simply believe in Bush because he's one of them and basically does what he does in the name of 'God', as he's fooled them into thinking.
You have overstated and included facts that aren't actually proven or true, but the 'guts' of what you're trying to say is evident.
The war IS legal, but illegitimate due to all the Bush proven lies.
650,000 'murdered' Iraqis is quite high, but there are countless thousands, for sure.
Bush could NEVER have 'changed the Geneva Convention' rules of war.
Congress did ok the 'wiretaps'.
I do agree that Bush is a terrible, terrible president and most likely the worst EVER, and you're right, I have no doubt that a LOT of the potential 'terror plots' are dreamt up by the CIA, et al.
2007-11-17 12:48:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I can defend everything you brought up without mentioning Clinton.....
The war isn't illegal, it is supported by the UN and authorized by congress.
Bush has never murdered anybody and the Iraqi civilian body count isn't any where near 650,000.
Bush never violated the Geneva conventions and even if he had, he has no authority to change them.
Immunity for the telecommunications act was approved by congress.
Why do liberals have to either out right lie or twist facts to try and make Bush look bad?
2007-11-17 12:44:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
All you have to do is take a look at the Democrat Candidates and then look at the Republican Candidates. What you were watching was a woman that would make a great President, She took up for herself all the time smiling, She told Obama and Edwards in a very nice way to get off of my a** and stay of it, both of them were booed when they started the same old stupid question trying run her down You seen a woman that will be our next President of the United States.
Take a look at your Republican Candidates they are about nearest nothings that ever existed. Rudy running around with so much baggage , McCain his just running around saying nothing, all of them are not even worthy of being a Page Boy. If that is all the Republican party has to offer than they are in sad shape. I won't watch them on 11/28/2007, I hate to see a grown man make a total a** of themselves. It makes you feel sorry and ashamed if any other country is able to watch them make a damn fool out of themselves. Bill Clinton did nothing that if any man on this site wouldn't have done, not one would have turned Monica down, not one.
2007-11-17 13:55:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
One reason is that Billy Boy got us into this situation. He thought with the only head he brains in,or at least some blood flow to. While getting his b-j, he was f-up America. He is the jerk-off who INSISTED that Mohammed Atta,and ALL prisoners,not just "political-prisoners" be freed by Israel as part of the OSLO agreement. Atta thanked us,for Billy Boy's kindness, by flying a plane into TOWER ONE of THE WORLD TRADE CENTER!!! or HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN THAT??? OH YEAH, ANOTHER THING, IT DEPENDS ON WHAT YOUR DEFINITION OF "ATTACK" IS. As long as You insist on talking numbers of Billy Boy's b-j (58 mil.) THINK ABOUT THESE NUMBERS ----19 charges,8 convictions,4 imprisonment's from WHITEWATER, AND THE 55 criminal, 32 criminal convictions (so far) IN ALL THE OTHER "CLINTON" SCANDALS!!!! and now You want to throw a PITY-PARTY for his old lady??? Not only did Billy Boy get a b-j, HE IS A B-J aka "BIG JERK". Also, the way you seem to chant "B-J B-J B-J"!!! ARE YOU TELLING OFF ON YOURSELF??? OH YEAH, this is not an "ATTACK" on your character. ANOTHER THING, I'm limited to only 500 billion character spaces,and I have just scratched the surface on the "B-E"aka "BLACK EYE" HILL-BILLY aka "CLINTON(s)" HAVE LEFT ON THIS GREAT COUNTRY!!!
2007-11-17 13:56:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by MIKE H 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well you have alot of empty accusations you are throwing at Bush and talking about something most of are glad the president got.
I know I am glad to know that the guy with the nuclear football gets his. But not so glad that he lies under oath.
Now when you have some proof against Bush please try again.
2007-11-17 12:45:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by SFC_Ollie 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Most of the time when I see that answer used it is because the maker of the question is asking stuff like this...
"...Bush is a monkey...?"
"...Bush is an idiot...?"
Do you really expect them to get serious answers? Oh please, if you ask me they don't deserve to be taken seriously.
2007-11-17 12:44:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Luekas 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Meh, I'd agree with you, but his wife hasn't exactly taken the high road, every other word out of her mouth is: republicans are evil, republicans are the liars... blah blah blah. Don't worry I think both parties are full of morons.
2007-11-17 13:11:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by scorch_22 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because Clinton has given so much Ammo it is impossible to resist.
2007-11-17 12:40:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Three things...
1 You are a liar
2 You must be a retard if you expect anyone with a brain stem to believe your lies
3 Thanks for the 2 points
2007-11-17 13:06:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lucius Vorenus 3
·
2⤊
4⤋