I'm anxiously waiting Judith Regan's tell all on the former Mayor and now presidential candidate. It should be quite interesting. Rudy might even give Georgie a run for his money in the corruption department.
2007-11-17 15:05:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
You use the term "cross-dresser" without taking into account that it was a costume stunt, not a lifestyle. And with the number of conservatives who have had adulterous affairs or been divorced, it's difficult to see why Guilani stands out in that crowd. But you may be right. It's hard to see how someone who respects individuals rights, and who believes in tolerance and equality can accurately represent conservative values.
2016-05-24 00:49:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I get so tired of seeing the cross dressing thing when every intelligent person knows it was one particular event, not a lifestyle for Giuliani. As far as multiple marriages, cast not the first stone. I have never seen a manual telling me what should be my conservative family values. Maybe I am too "stooopid" to know. Whatever. I don't support Giuliani but your question is ignorant in my opinion.
2007-11-17 12:29:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
What does cross-dressing for a fundraiser and one's position on abortion rights have to do with family values?
I can easily understand divorce, but the rest is pure fluff.
2007-11-17 13:38:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Liberals love America! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does a person who accepts money from criminals, spent most of her life as a dirty lawyer, really someone who represents liberal values? nobody matches there party perfectly... that said I wouldn't vote for Giuliani for anything.
2007-11-17 13:29:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by scorch_22 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He does in this day and age. Simply look at Mark Foley, David Vitter, Duke Cunningham, Larry Craig, and a host of others. Neo-cons have ruined the conservative image.
True conservatives are spinning in their graves out of disbelief, at this very moment.
2007-11-17 12:52:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
According to Christian Reichsfuhrer Pat Robertson, he does. For the apocalyptic Christers, it's all about joining the "winning team." They figure that by casting aside their principles in order to achieve a greater goal, they are doing "God's Will." (This sounds eerily similar to the tactics of Islamic terrorists who adopt the "infidel ways" in order to defeat them.)
addendum:
"Getting Ready For Hillary," I see. Like the typical defeatist far-right conservatives they are, they've preemptively declared her the winner. (What is it with cons and preemption?)
2007-11-17 12:33:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, but then again neither do Republicans.
Sources: Senator Larry Craig, Senator Foley, Senator David Viter, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.
2007-11-17 12:57:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No.
That's why I'm supporting John McCain and Mike Huckabee!
2007-11-17 12:51:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Neal 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
LOL, if he disgrace cons why do cons now say that we should like him?
I think he is a total mess
2007-11-17 12:33:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5
·
4⤊
0⤋