How can it claim to be a secular democracy with liberal qualities (such as free speech) when it will not tolerate any anti-Gandhi sentiment? The education system, the left-wing media, the law enforcment bodies (such as the police and courts) will come down on you like a ton of bricks if you criticise Gandhi. Text books only give one side of the story, about how great he was blah blah blah blah blah. His failures are not so much looked at and if anyone dares to contradict the presiding sentiment that the majority of Indians have been brainwashed with, they are attacked by the Congress party Goons.
Fair enough, if Indians want to love and admire Ghandhi, that is their decision. However where is the justification in forcing everyone to love and admire him and in curtailing any criticism of Gandhi.
Those people who do not like Gandhi have just as much right to express themselves as those that do love Gandhi. However anti-ghandi people are automatically considered fascist.
2007-11-17
09:44:22
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics