Well you couldn't do wrong to ride with the old cliche about the two brothers with opposing viewpoints. One stands by the King while the other supports the forces of Parliament. To make it more 'interesting,' it would be the Older Brother who supports the 'rebels,' while the younger Son stands by the King - - - therefore the older brother 'profits' by the decision since King Charles the First 'lost' (and lost his head in the process)... BUT - - - -years later when Parliament decided that it could not handle the job of managing England and handed the task to King Charles the 2nd, it is the Older Brother forced to go off in disgrace and it is left to the younger brother to restore the family to favor.
These sort of things actually happend!!
Essentially the forces of 'freedom & liberty,' stepped back and said 'ooooppppss! Our bad." The Restoration of the Monarchy is heralded as 'progress.' Go figure.
You ought to hunt down an obscure but wonderful book, 'Beaufort; The Duke & His Duchess; 1657 to 1715,' by Molly McClain.' The Duke's father supported the Roundheads and it was up to the son to restore the family to favor when the Monarchy was restored.
Here is one of my favorite English Civil War Cites it will give you insight.
Please note all parties involved in the War were flawed, there was no black & white or right & wrong - - - those were turbellent confusing times and no one emerges as a Saint not the Sainted Charles the One or the unfortunately maligned Oliver Cromwell (see Antonio Fraser's wonderfull bio)...
http://www.open2.net/civilwar/
http://www.open2.net/civilwar/2.0.breakdown.html
"""The origins of the Civil War are evident in the early reign of Charles I. Although Charles' period of personal rule appeared to be successful, conflict simmered below the surface, often focused on religion. William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury, initiated a series of high church reforms which antagonised Puritans and led to a wave of religious persecution. Charles' French wife, Henrietta Maria, became a focus for Catholic sentiment at court and this reinforced the notion that Charles was a 'closet papist', while Charles' refusal to assist fellow Protestants in Europe during the Thirty Years War only strengthened this belief.
While English tensions simmered below the surface, the Scottish origins of the English Civil War are extremely important. Charles' attempt to impose an Anglican Prayer book on the Scottish Kirk in 1637 resulted in the fiasco of the First Bishops War and the calling of a Parliament in spring 1640, the first for eleven years. However, while Charles expected the Parliament to provide support and supply for a second Scottish expedition, MPs used this opportunity to express their dissatisfaction with royal policy. Charles dismissed the Parliament after only three weeks.
Charles experienced further setbacks during the Second Bishops War and called a second Parliament in November 1640. During this Parliament, the King's opponents aimed their fire on royal advisers Laud and Strafford, resulting in an escalation of crisis. Laud and Strafford were both jailed before the Christmas recess, and Strafford was executed in May 1641.
By mid-1641, the crisis seemed to have passed. Charles had caved in to several Parliamentary demands, and he was on his way north to make his peace with the Scots. However, just at this moment, Ireland exploded in rebellion and the three kingdoms were hurtling towards a fresh crisis.""
Peace.... /// ---------O . u . O ------------ \\\..........................c
2007-11-17 09:24:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by JVHawai'i 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why not write about the creation of the New Model Army in 1645. The creation of this, the first trully professional army, was what won the war for the Parlimentarians. Under Cromwell's skilled leadership the New Model Army laid the foundations of most professional armies of today.
This would appeal in the US also because for the first time the New Model Army was a force based on an individuals ability rather than their position is society. That should sit well with the American ideals of a classless society?
2007-11-18 02:31:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why do no longer you have a inspect John Buchan's e book, 'The 39 Steps.' the ambience is pre-1914 merely merely before the outbreak of hostilities. The events he talks approximately, the espionage, the sentiments of the English interior the process the Germans, ( a similar sentiments that he, himself shares,) and so plenty greater is very useful and that is an adventure tale that I dare you to place down. Buchan might probable good have greater beneficial some 'somewhat existence' fabrics, disguised as fiction pondering of his paintings with the British military, wherein he served in intelligence. that is an attractive tale line and doubtless the oldest one : good as unfavourable to evil. regardless of e book you're making a call to wish, verify that its interest point grabs you by potential of way of the throat and it ought to no longer show you how to bypass. Then, your fiction paper could be the bigger for it. good fulfillment jointly along with your writing.
2016-11-11 22:45:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There were conflicts over just about everything. The Puritans were holier than everyone else and were not ashamed to make everyone else believe it. They went on a huge campaign to outlaw just about anything fun - dancing around a Maypole, kissing under the mistletoe, Christmas, dancing, playing "frivolous" music, madrigals (bawdy songs), watching plays, playing cards, gambling, going to the circus, wearing colorful clothes, drinking, and they even outlawed getting married in churches.
The King's men thought they had the authority to do anything in the King's name. By this time gunsmiths were using manure and human waste for the nitrogen to make gunpowder. The King's Men raided people's homes to rob their latrine pits! They also taxed everything.
John Milton, the famous poet, was Cromwell's secretary. He was a very refined man, and his perceptions about all the brutality going on would make interesting reading.
2007-11-17 09:29:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋