English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are there enough socialists, communists and anti American anarchists to get her elected?

2007-11-17 06:49:16 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

Robert S: explain to me why we should respect an enemy of America's opinion again. Especially one who is reunning for POTUS

2007-11-17 07:16:41 · update #1

Robert S: explain to me why we should respect an enemy of America's opinion again. Especially one who is running for POTUS

2007-11-17 07:17:09 · update #2

Bobo: Yes I can. Rudy Giuliani.

2007-11-17 09:30:16 · update #3

22 answers

To under-estimate Hillary Clinton is too dangerous to even consider.

JUST DON'T DO IT!

2007-11-17 12:13:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Clinton's a neoliberal warmongering statist. Why would anarchists vote for her?

Guiliani's a fascist warmongering statist, but that's still no reason to support Clinton.

Do you have any idea how often Guiliani's administration violated people's constitutional rights? What with shooting civilians, beating and arresting dissidents on false charges ...

Following New Evidence of Coerced Confessions, NYCLU Calls on Police to Videotape Interrogations (9/17/2002)

http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14560prs20020917.html

"The most dramatic example of potentially criminal misconduct [by the police and the administration] arose from the mass arrest of nearly 400 people during a demonstration near Union Square. Criminal court complaints filed by a high-level NYPD official claimed that group was arrested only after being given an order to disperse and refusing to disperse, but that official admitted recently in sworn testimony that no one gave such an order. The NYCLU, which has sued over this mass arrest, will ask the FBI to include this incident and other incidents in its criminal investigation."

http://www.aclu.org/safefree/dissent/25593prs20060517.html

2007-11-18 11:43:35 · answer #2 · answered by MarjaU 6 · 1 1

It should never be a us versus them mentality. Thats why nothing is being done for the good of the country. A democrat or a republican or even an independent have their views of what America should be and where it should be going. This should always be respected as they are all Americans wanting whats best for the country in their view. Pick a candidate or party that best meets yours. Remember everyone has freedom of choice and speech and everyone has a right to disagree. Fear mongering on all sides just has to stop.
Please lets not go back to the mentality of the McCarthy era where you start to see socialists, communists and anti American anarchists under every bush. And even if you actually believe that there is, there are not enough to get her elected. Also Hilliary will not get elected. A white male republican will be elected.

2007-11-17 07:02:29 · answer #3 · answered by Robert S 5 · 3 4

Nope, there are few socialists, communists or anti-American anarchists - certainly not enough to elect Sen. Clinton. But then there are the rest of us who will be voting for her. I'm a moderate Democrat, she has my vote. It doesn't matter how often the smear specialists call her a socialist or a communist, no one is buying that crap but your own crowd. Most of America can recognize a moderate capitalist when they see one and they see one in Hillary. She respects the Constitution, unlike our erstwhile Georger Bush, who has systemically shredded it and thinks it's nothing but a piece of paper. It will be nice to have someone back in office who understands it's importance.

An enemy of America's opinion? Now that's funny. Do you really think your opinion equals the opinion of the rest of America? Thanks for the chuckle.

2007-11-17 08:10:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

No matter who gets into office the constitution is indeed gone. The elder Bush started the movement for the North American Union. President Clinton ( Bill ) continued the process, George W has continued the process ( bankrupting the country by financing the war by borrowing billions upon billions.) Hillary will continue the process until the formation of the North American Union estimated to happen in 2010.

2007-11-17 07:25:27 · answer #5 · answered by acedelux 6 · 0 4

Like her husband, Hillary is just a Bush Lite, center-right Democrat. Anarchists certainly will not vote for her.

News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo/

2007-11-17 12:36:23 · answer #6 · answered by clore333 5 · 1 2

There are not enough socialists, communists and anti American anarchists to get *anybody* elected.

2007-11-17 10:00:59 · answer #7 · answered by yutsnark 7 · 1 2

Americans need to realize there's a world of difference between the following two words...POLITICIAN(magician!) & REPRESENTATIVE(constitutional!). If ya vote in a "magician" yer gonna get tricked for sure! If you vote in a "representative you will receive constitutionally based government. Do you know of a candidate that is currently "STANDING" for the executive office that has a 100% perfect constitutionally based voting record? If so, do you know the candidates name? Hagar22, if you do know a candidate that meets the above qualification will you list that candidate's name above on your post for all to see?

2007-11-17 08:12:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Here's a little something that I borrowed from my new best friend avatar:

A Day in the Life of Joe Republican

Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards. With his first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to ensure their safety and that they work as advertised.

All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer’s medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance - now Joe gets it too. He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe’s bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.


In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total contents because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.

Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for the laws to stop industries from polluting our air. He walks on the government-provided sidewalk to subway station for his government-subsidized ride to work. It saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.

Joe begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe’s employer pays these standards because Joe’s employer doesn’t want his employees to call the union.

If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, he’ll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some stupid liberal didn’t think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.

It is noontime and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe’s deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some godless liberal wanted to protect Joe’s money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression.

Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-market federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his lifetime. Joe also forgets that his in addition to his federally subsidized student loans, he attended a state funded university. Joe is home from work.

He plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for car safety standards to go along with the tax-payer funded roads.

He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers’ Home Administration because bankers didn’t want to make rural loans. The house didn’t have electricity until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn’t belong and demanded rural electrification.

He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn’t have to.

Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. He doesn’t mention that the beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day. Joe agrees: “We don’t need those big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I’m a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have.”

2007-11-17 17:44:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No, that is incorrect, and there are not enough socialists, communists and anti American anarchists that would vote for her.
She is the most moderate, and pro business of both parties candidates, more of the same.

The Constitution is in tatters at this moment, that should concern you more than Shrillary.

2007-11-17 07:04:21 · answer #10 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 6 5

fedest.com, questions and answers