English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-17 05:50:04 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

If they would have had a security camera, we'd know exactly what Jane Tanner saw.

In no way am I saying that the cameras could have been a free babysitter.

2007-11-17 10:34:08 · update #1

7 answers

Beats me. They stayed in the Algarve which is the more expensive part of Portugal and they are both high wage-earners who chose not to use the hotel's babysitting service. ?????????????????????

2007-11-17 06:00:40 · answer #1 · answered by jenesuispasunnombre 6 · 4 0

That's a good question, but I don't have a good answer...

Hopefully the Warner Group will have a rethink and put security camera's in all their resorts.....but then..it isn't up to the resort to worry about the security of your children is it. They expect parents to be taking care of their own childrens safety.

2007-11-17 18:19:45 · answer #2 · answered by Curious39 6 · 3 0

They can't put video cameras in a hotel room; I think there's a law against that or something. What if someone was getting into their pyjamas and the cameras saw them naked? That wouldn't be too good and it would be against the law.

2007-11-17 18:12:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It seems like people are really obsessed with this case. I understand a little bit, because that is like the cutest kid I have ever seen, and it's deeply disturbing to think about what happened to her. Are you related to her or something? Sadly, it happens all the time. There's probably tons of missing kids in your own town, and maybe it would be more fruitful to help investigate those.

2007-11-17 14:11:23 · answer #4 · answered by Dust ~ 2 · 2 1

Excellent question.
The resort should have had and should have security Cameras.
They should be sued.

2007-11-17 23:55:58 · answer #5 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 2 0

Its nothing to do with the resort. It is a parents responsibility to look after their child and not put them in danger.

2007-11-17 14:07:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

;;;;;;;;;;;;;
'''''''''''''''''

2007-11-18 00:47:09 · answer #7 · answered by Two Pints Lager 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers