2007-11-17 05:16:13 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We did from the start. The question is, should we stop payment?
2007-11-17 05:19:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
'We' more or less have given the Bush Junta a blank check...not only a blank check but the key to the safe and a licence to steal. Remember when we were told by Rumsfeld that, "....this war will cost about 50 billion dollars, but it will be paid for with Iraqi oil." Several weeks after that the 'shock and awe' became shuck and jive and nothing has change since...except that it's gotten worse. Really and truely, this BushWar for Oil... (Oh yeah...it's not about oil.) is going to break the bank if it's not already broke. In spite of the warhawks blather to the contrary, this war is spreading....a little less in Iraq, but a lot more in other places. Net gain...zero! My advise for all hands is to get your house paid for, pay off all your bills, try to get steady employment and learn how to live on less. If you hear it on FOX or one of the right wing radio propaganda stations it's total BS...don't be fooled. This situation is serious and demands your immediate attention. You're being sheared like a sheep by the incompetent policies and politics of the reactionaries that hijacked the GOP. Like rats, when all this goes belly up they'll run like thieves and leave the American wage-earner holding the bag. I wish this wasn't true, but it is...no kiddin'!
2007-11-17 05:34:41 · answer #2 · answered by Noah H 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
he's no longer soliciting for a sparkling examine that's merely Pelosi's sound chew for the media. he's soliciting for funds for greater desirable than 2 months on the time. No company or business enterprise approves 2 month budgets - that's ludicrous & a thoroughly ineffective thank you to run the armed forces & Congress. Is Congress making plans to do something different than combat over the Iraq warfare? What on the subject of the rustic's residing house goverment - welfare, immigration, social protection reform, coverage reform - is not any one in Congress worried approximately those subject concerns? each and every 2 months is stupid making plans - no sparkling examine merely an identical appreciate for armed forces shown for over 230 years.
2016-12-09 00:22:54 · answer #3 · answered by crumley 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea, esp since the Iraq war and the war on terror is just a smokescreen on stealing trillions of tax dollars. THEY did the 911 attacks and all the money is going to their companies.
2007-11-17 06:01:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We should not give him anymore money! If he wants more tell him to go over to the Pentagon and look for the 1 1/2 Trillion missing! Wonder who's pockets that ended up in?
2007-11-17 05:32:39 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-11-17 15:50:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Remember folks he said the" oil will pay for the war" instead they are spending TRILLIONS of our tax dollar and not taking care of Americans at HOME It's time to cancel the check he and his cronies are getting very rich indeed.
2007-11-17 05:24:02 · answer #7 · answered by joyce s 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It seems the current Administration already has--they have forgotten that the President is supposed to represent the people not the other way around. That's another type---I believe it's called "Dictatorship."
2007-11-17 05:23:42 · answer #8 · answered by Marie Q 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No! Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2007-11-17 06:52:09 · answer #9 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep Dems take the blame on this unfortunately. They rolled over and gave AWOL Chimp and Five deferrement "I had other priorities" Dick a blank check....
2007-11-17 05:24:08 · answer #10 · answered by nicewknd 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I thought it was against the law to pass bad checks.
2007-11-17 05:21:18 · answer #11 · answered by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋