Women lay eggs during each cycle of ovulation. But these are so tiny. Compare to a hen, who lay eggs every day. The size of egg is like one twentieth of the body mass of the hen as well. Why cant women lay eggs like this instead of being fat.
2007-11-17 03:57:53 · 18 answers · asked by ByTheWay 4 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Seriously....
2007-11-17 04:08:19 · update #1
Neptune2bsure is winning as of now :)
2007-11-17 04:24:44 · update #2
doodlebugjim is now at front
2007-11-17 04:46:32 · update #3
Thanks for n and t and ' lesson. English is not my first language and I am really learning English.
can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't
2007-11-17 05:10:16 · update #4
RobLee is the funniest
2007-11-17 21:04:24 · update #5
BAWWWK! BAAAAAAWWWK!
Aren't we too much like hens already?
Besides. I had to squeeze out three babies. I wouldn't want to do that every month!
LMAO
2007-11-17 04:07:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think laying eggs would be better than all the child birth stuff and walking around with a big gut. Plus, once the egg is out, you just have to keep in warm and the mother can go do other things.
Less hospital time if any and less annoying mood swings. Chickens may be ahead of humans in some ways.. hahahaha.
But that's biology... no ones fault.
2007-11-17 04:07:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Seriously You also want to be pecking the ground all day...you are comparing two different species for goodness sake. And you don't get fat when you are pregnant, you are with child, and pregnant women emanate a glow about them that is captivating and everyone feels protective of that person, have you ever noticed that. everyone is interested in her pregnancy because to many of us it is still a miracle, a new creation...how can you compare this to something you fry every morning, one is for pro creation the other is for sustenance of your creation...
2007-11-17 04:22:00 · answer #3 · answered by Neptune2bsure 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, yeah, why couldnt them?! I mean, they are soooo dumb... If they chose to lay bigger eggs, they would lose weight AND feed the poor with their protein-rich unfertilized wastes!.
I guess world hunger is is women's fault, for being able to do something about it, and at the same time for themselves, but they are sooo dumb and selfish!!
The smaller the egg is, the less energy investment it requires, which is an evolutionary advantage. Chickens cannot have smaller eggs because the infant must grow inside it.
2007-11-17 04:37:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sure would save on having to be preggers in the hot months; no more worry about carrying that extra load and sweating like we're Niagara Falls.
2007-11-17 05:34:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
LOL!!!!XD haha this question made me laugh!!...and whats being fat got to do with laying eggs!?!?! 0.o
2007-11-17 07:09:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not all women are fat. We prefer to carry compact items, and would you like to pass a watermelon each month? Didn't think so.
2007-11-17 04:32:22 · answer #7 · answered by Deirdre O 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
On health & safety grounds I think we should not be encouraged to eat human females' unfertilised eggs. Not even scrambed and on toast.
2007-11-17 04:34:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If human female laid eggs then feminists would quickly launch a law suit to ensure the eggs are property of the female.
2007-11-17 14:00:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
If women could lay eggs it could explain why your brain's SCRAMBLED...lay off the crack pipe..idiot!
2007-11-18 15:13:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋