No, she should not play the gender card. But it doesn't surprise me if she does. She likes that whole "victim" thing....it's not your fault, it because of this....yeah right. If she becomes President, the other world leaders are not gonna give a crap that she's a woman. If anything playing the gender card would only hurt her. Many leaders look down on women as being weak...playing that card is a sign of weakness.
2007-11-17 03:18:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by smellyfoot ™ 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
all and assorted might want to no longer favor to trust it, notwithstanding the newness of a first female president or a first black president, is uppermost in a lot of a voter's suggestions. no matter if it has any substance. It takes a lengthy time period to get to the placement of being considered for the properly activity and maximum applicants will do almost something to make it a actuality. All this considered, that's not often staggering that both Clinton and Obama have levelled it all the way down to three 'difficulty-free denominators'. Britain's Gordon Brown is continuously raking up his Presbyterian, higher-operating-class historic past, yet no-one believes it has any severe relation to what he thinks and does. Rhetoric is the beef of politics and individuals ought to take it for what that's. If it has undue impression, human beings favor to learn in the route of abode for the reason why.
2016-10-24 09:43:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not a female however, I don't believe that Hillary is "playing" a gender card any more than say Edwards or Rudy is playing the "I'm a male" card.
Hillary never said she would bring the troops home immediately...she has remained consistent in her point...the situation will dictate the numbers brought home. Think about it....we are in this mess and we simply cannot pull out and leave chaos to reign...it must be an orderly pull out. If anyone advocates differently they are simply not connected to the issue.
Hillary never changed her view on the driver's license issue...again you just hear what you want to hear...by the way are you a republican dressed as a demo?
2007-11-17 03:16:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by malter 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
What is wrong to remind Americans that she is the first woman to stand up and assert equality of genders?
American society evolves to give equal opportunities to all sections so that the constitution ensuring equality is really a living document rather than a mere paper. Presently the scope is only 50 % ,assuming that the male members of the different sections of the society are having equal opportunity, which unfortunately is not the case.
Flip flopping , though wrongly coined phrase of convenience, is otherwise purports to using discretion according to the dynamics of rapidly varying ground realities. Say, for example Obama said he will fight the terrorists deep in Pakistan( an ally), without even obtaining its permission; that he will personally enter in to dialogues with enemies like Iran; that he will not wear the lapel pin and flag just for the sake of exhibiting pseudo patriotism. Has he been spared for his frank talk? Suppose he were to be given a chance to correct himself, will he or not clarify and change his stance ?
2007-11-17 04:02:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary could come out in a debate, drop the F bomb several times and probably physically attack the others and still will get the nomination, I have never seen a candicacy more set up by the Media.
2007-11-17 03:15:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by El Guapo 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
All these people who think Hillary should play the gender carde are NUTS!
Do you see Obama playing the race card. No you dont
2007-11-17 06:11:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by 2008 matters 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's hard not to "play the gender card" when the whole country is buzzing like an angry hornet's nest over the idea of a female president. She's probably asked about something gender-related 20 times a day.
2007-11-17 03:17:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Buying is Voting 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I do not think she should play the gender card.
As for her answers, she is attempting to do what most candidates have been doing forever-play both sides. Use lots of words that in the end mean nothing-in other words, baffle them with bullsh** if you can't impress them with the 30 second soundbite.
2007-11-17 03:17:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hillary is unelectable in the general election. I don't understand anyone who would vote for her when she doesn't have the experience and most certainly will not stand up for justice against terrorists.... Why are all the dems so scared of Fox News.. If they call themselves fair. Do a debate on there insteand of CNN(Clintoon News Network)....
2007-11-17 03:15:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
I just want to vote for the lesser of the evils... They all say stuff and make promises that never really happen...if it's a man, woman, hermaphadite, ect... and they seem like less a threat to us, I'll vote for them.... But I really am questioning if it will help matters though...This country and the politics are changing to take, take take, from the working class and make us dirt poor while they bathe in the money we worked our @$$es for...
2007-11-17 03:21:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋