2007-11-17 02:56:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillary could not be more full of it if she tried but, she IS trying.
Why? Because it works. She is leading in the polls, always has and always will until the convention.
She and her husband have found an intellectual weakness in a large segment of our society. A segment that actually finds BS admirable.
The rest of us are at their mercy.
They are leading the charge to race past their own advancing troops to plant the white flag. It can't even be called surrender. It's something else. The first time it has ever been seen in history and has yet to be defined.
The Amazing Clinton's magic illusion show.
2007-11-17 03:05:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, at least she could debate Governor Spitzer. It was his idea, which he decided not to go through with due to seventy percent of New Yorkers not wanting it.
It was a stupid question to ask in a national debate as she is not in charge of lawmaking within the state of NY, shes a federal senator and driving regulations are decided by the states. This is such a non issue when we have a country at war, an obviously very divided population, and serious issues of the health and welfare of the nation to contend with.
We really are getting lost in minutiae again and losing sight of what the President really does, and is responsible for.
I can only wonder why, after two weeks, we are still discussing this totally worthless point and don't tell me its flip-flop time, because this election cycle we have enough flopping on all sides to make that moot.
2007-11-17 11:05:27 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't take much intelligence to figure out that Hillary Clinton did not contradict herself on the driver's license issue. You need merely listen to what she said. It does however take some common sense and a little intelligence to listen for oneself rather than accept the spin of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
2007-11-17 11:02:47 · answer #3 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I hate political expediency, it's what keeps insane policies in place, because overcoming their inertia and (re)educating the mob is too costly.
The question was parochial though and I think that's what got Obama so flummoxed. Come on Wolf, we may be political idiots, but you're not... do better.
2007-11-17 11:05:49 · answer #4 · answered by Mark P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Bush can argue with himself to convince himself into making decisions that cost thousands of lives of American soldiers, not to mention hundreds of thousands of civilions, I am willing to cut Hilary some slack.
2007-11-17 11:11:48 · answer #5 · answered by I could care less 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably as a three headed beast. No disrespect here but how many mouths can one speak out of any way? Only ones I know of came from mythology. Candidate Clinton is no myth. Just an anomaly, that's for certain. Thanks.
2007-11-17 11:02:05 · answer #6 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
When she's flipflopping all of her ideology every other debate, it's a shame if people can't see that she's just trying to tell the public what they want to hear.
2007-11-17 11:00:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
She already has, i watched her for three weeks and in the last debate and she was debating herself.
2007-11-17 11:02:56 · answer #8 · answered by DJR 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋