English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It has always been the Clinton "m.o." to disparage, attack, harm, intimidate and attempt to destroy anyone for "whistle blowing" on a Clinton.

Funny, the Clinton apologists love whistle blowers when they the target is their political enemy- Valerie Plame, Erin Brokovich, John Dean, etc.; the whistle blowers they condemn are Paula Jones, Linda Tripp and now Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff better watch her back. Muriel came forward to bring evidence that sHrillery is filling public q/a's with ringers.

Don't forget sHrillery is the one who hired the P.I.'s and thugs to smear and intimidate the victims of Billy's trysts, harrassments, rapes, gropes, affairs, etc. sHrilery doesn't care who's blowing Bill's whistle, she only cares about protecting the farce of her marriage (HillBilly Camelot) that the Clintons and media have fabricated.

2007-11-17 02:55:20 · 4 answers · asked by ____ 2 in Politics & Government Elections

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/13/clinton.planted/index.html

2007-11-17 02:56:21 · update #1

4 answers

Yeah, and nobody ever talks about how he sent young men to war on the word of the UN.

Democrats and Republicans are all alike. They're scum.

Ron Paul 08

2007-11-17 03:01:46 · answer #1 · answered by idontknow 3 · 1 0

in basic terms whilst it fairly is against those 'evil' companies or conservatives. look how they are attempting to cover up the emails showing they cooked the so call scientific documents approximately worldwide warming. the liberal media is actual ignoring the biggest scandal of the last decade. the liberal media had no problem printing Palin's hacked e mail so using this as an excuse is ridiculous. in addition they'll print labeled documents on monitoring terrorists and delicate intel so as that the terrorists can adjust and alter their tactics. now they by surprise have ethics and could no longer print 'private' supplies. btw. those are PUBLIC documents.ed without tax money so as that they are PUBLIC documents. obama and this WH are allergic to dissent. they punish all and sundry who dares to have a distinctive stumble on or opinion. the promised transparency is one among obama's best lies and deceptions. they did no longer 'invite' the genuine interest creators to their 'interest summit' as they dared to declare they have been against the wellbeing care plan and the cap and commerce. those attending are one that contributed to obama and function supported all his socialist plans. in basic terms 10% of obama's paintings tension has ever held a real interest or competed in a real interest. that's 'historic' in all different administrations. this president and adminstration would not problem on the subject of the form, they use regulations to circumvent it. they are using the bus they are throwing us decrease than. we would desire to get off the bus and to greater floor.

2016-12-16 11:24:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is every question on this website, senceless and immature? I have been here for like 10 minutes now and Im already thinking about canceling my account.

2007-11-17 02:59:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

To the first responder:

No, I think there is just a huge wave of redneck conservatism this morning. It's all over.

2007-11-17 03:01:53 · answer #4 · answered by Buying is Voting 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers