English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Nazi's were digusting bigoted slime who slaughtered 9 million people and the German people let them do it because they believed the foolish propaganda that the Jews "subhuman". The libigots have told us the same thing, that unborn children are "subhuman" and the result is the slaughter of 50 Million people right in our own back yard! End age descrimination! Just say no to abortion!

2007-11-17 02:39:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Why should you be able to take the choice away from a women = Why should you be able to take the choice from a Nazi

2007-11-17 02:42:57 · update #1

All you libigots who wrote about how these children would be raised in poverty forget two things. 1. There is a seven year waiting list to adopt a healthy child and 2 your hero Bill Clinton was raised in poverty. Would you have prefered him aborted as well?

2007-11-17 02:49:48 · update #2

16 answers

very interesting, this is the reason I love y/a

your right, libs are the new SS officers in the holocaust that has cost the american people 40 million lives and counting.

there will come a day the justices in the roe v wade decision will be judged by God as the worst genocidal maniacs in the history of mankind

2007-11-17 02:44:49 · answer #1 · answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5 · 4 5

The Nazis learned about eugenics, the "science" of creating a "master race" from studies and policies suggested by a very conservative abd Republican Stanford University, right here in the good old US of A. The idea of sterilizing the gsubhuman populations was not new to the Nazis. They managed to raise it to a very extreme level, but it took a king time to desensitize the German population to what they were doing. They actually began the "purification" plan with the insane and the disabled that had become a financial burden after WW I. A good synopisis of what occurred can be found in the pamphlet, "Useless Eaters".

2007-11-17 02:54:08 · answer #2 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0 1

no, why should you be able to take the choice away from women. next time you want to same some embryos why don't you try and stop IVF, that causes the discarding of embryos but i don't see you pro life people going to protest against that. or would you rather adopt those children now that they need a home i think 50 mill is a lot of mouths to feed.

what about those children that have to go without health care, if you are pro life then wouldn't you be for keeping those children or do you enjoy pushing your narcissistic agenda on others.

so are you equating abortions with Nazism? yet you say that women shouldn't be able to have the choice because you believe that it is wrong. i think you will find the fascist Nazis were the ones that forced there beliefs on others.

2007-11-17 02:41:50 · answer #3 · answered by Gengi 5 · 3 4

[edit] Oh. Bill Clinton rises out of poverty. Therefore poverty has no effect on people's lives. You're not even worth these responses.

This is the dumbest thing I've ever read.

Conservatives have infinite compassion for people only until they're actually born. Then it's THEIR fault for not succeeding in life in spite of an impoverished family, drug-abusing parents, crime-wrecked neighborhoods, extremely bad public education, and poor nutrition.

Notice how conservatives champion the death penalty when someone does something really wrong. Kind of ironic to be wailing for the unborn with one hand, and viciously cheering for the death penalty with the other, is it not?

When you blame people for the consequences of an extremely unhealthy childhood, they're likely to believe they'll never make it out, and resort to bad choices such as having children too young, which perpetuates the cycle. If you can't see that, I feel very, very sorry for you.

2007-11-17 02:43:09 · answer #4 · answered by Buying is Voting 7 · 4 4

At the heart of liberalism is despotism. Liberalism is despotism disguised as democracy. Liberalism was at the heart of the Nazi movement. They were hedonistic sadists who only wanted power and to indulge in their physical perversity. This is what liberalism is. It has no values, except that of the self interest of hedonism and power. This is why liberals are able to classify certain people as non-people. They did it with African slaves in this country, they did it with Jews in Germany, and they do it all over the world with unborn people. At the heart of liberalism is despotism, and when they gain absolute power, terrible things happen. When one has no core values except hedonism and power, when one is Godless and is ones own god, there is no limit to ones ignorance, unfairness, idiocy, barbarity and cruelty. Hitler and the Nazis are a result of liberals gaining a foothold in Germany. Many of Hitlers supporters were women who were attracted to him. Remind you of someone here? Perverse sexuality was at the very heart of Nazi Germany. Russia, China, Vietnam and Cuba have and still suffer because of liberalism. Elion Gonzalez now suffers in Cuba because of a liberal President here. The killing fields are a result of liberals getting a foothold in Cambodia. Abortion is a result of liberals getting a foothold in this nation.

2007-11-17 03:02:27 · answer #5 · answered by SithLord 4 · 2 3

Yes it does.

I want to know why killing your unwanted baby is even a Choice? Killing your unwanted neighbor isn't! They protest the execution of murderer's! why do they think murdering an innocent child is ok?

2007-11-17 02:55:31 · answer #6 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2 1

I'm not saying yes to abortion. I'm saying yes to letting the woman make a difficult decison rather than the government and the right wing activists who really don't give a crap about the woman but want to force their opinion on her anyway.

2007-11-17 02:43:28 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 2 4

I love the Republican definition of pro-life. They are so passionate about unformed, unviable cellular clusters, but once that person is born, they are cannon fodder. That is, after they've grown up without a decent education and with no insurance. They say they are pro-life, but all they show is is that they are pro-death.

2007-11-17 02:51:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 4

untill u adopt a unwanted kid don't talk to me about abortion

2007-11-17 03:01:23 · answer #9 · answered by tyler m 3 · 2 1

no liberal has called the unborn "sub-human"...they are certainly human, just not yet something more than a mass of cells....i agree that something with a functioning brain is fully developed, but if you are talking about before 10 weeks, it is just a mass of cells...Prove that any partial birth abortion has ever been performed.

2007-11-17 02:44:25 · answer #10 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers