CNN has declared Hillery the "winner" of the last democratic debate. Exactly what kind of unbiased journalism is this? Aren't we supposed to gauge for ourselves who we thought did well, and is that even the point of the debates? I thought they were to familiarize ourselves with the candidates positions.
2007-11-17 01:36:37 · 12 answers · asked by thor_torkenson 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
After this debate it became clear to me exactly how powerful the media really is. CNN obviously had no intentions of creating an unbiased debate as they filled the seats with Clinton supporters who continuously heckled Obama and Edwards. Also the questions Hillary were asked were once again suspect and a great candidate in Joe Biden once again did not get a chance to voice his opinion. CNN singlehandedly gave Clinton a huge edge over Obama and Edwards by tipping this debate in her favor. What a horrible political system this is when news networks decide the outcome of elections.
2007-11-17 02:47:08 · answer #1 · answered by steve2theo21 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How is that different that then declaring Guiliani the winner even though the polls showing him losing the first four primary states to Mitt Romney.
The question is who do YOU think won the last debate? Cause i'm with CNN on this one. She opened a can of Wup-*** on the rest of the boys.
2007-11-17 02:29:30 · answer #2 · answered by Alex G 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree, the other candidates were fools during the whole debate. Wolf Blitzer gave a tremendous amount of favor to Hillary. She was the obvious choice to win that debate. The rest of them had egg on their faces.
I still don't like her though.
2007-11-17 03:58:54 · answer #3 · answered by Tekla72 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
can we actual need to proceed the Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton style? i do no longer want 4 or 8 years of a co-president who debates what the definition of 'is' is. and that i could quite have somebody in the presidency in keeping with their very own reward, no longer those of their better half.
2016-12-16 11:20:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No hard questions for Hillary, and planted boos for opponents. Planted cheers for non answers. Isn't she glad Tim Russert wasn't their. No wonder it was in Las Vegas. Planted shells for Felony Clinton. The winner? I think not!
2007-11-17 01:43:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wrong. CNN and Rodham rigged the entire event.
2007-11-17 01:45:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The same unbiased journalism we get from FOX news.
2007-11-17 04:05:17 · answer #7 · answered by Kim 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
strangely the only place you wont hear liberals spouting inequality is when hillary gets a handicap from CNN
2007-11-17 01:47:52 · answer #8 · answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's C N N . Clinton News Network, why are you surprized?
2007-11-17 01:45:51 · answer #9 · answered by Scrappy52 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Whhhhhhaaaaat?!
How much money or how many 'clinton favors' did she whip out for that review?
What the hell kind of country is this?
2007-11-17 01:40:57 · answer #10 · answered by amosunknown 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋