Bush says"Nothing is put in my Library unless I approve it first" Is this his way of censoring history ?
2007-11-16 22:02:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Google it!
2007-11-16 22:06:58 · update #1
Since the libraries are constructed with private funds, I wish him luck raising $500 million. As for the censorship part, there are entirely too many documents going into a Presidential Library for any individual to monitor. I couldn't find anything to support your assertion that he'll have the final say on each and every document. Could you give us a source?
2007-11-16 22:14:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Certainly sounds like an edit to me, censoring for sure. Why? Why? Because he wants history to reflect the best of him. Well, he may as well leave a poster behind because not much good about him will fill a book, unless it is papers describing how he made the war monglers richer and anyone involved in oil, or related machinery, etc. richer. A trillion dollar deficit is hard to cover up, but than again hasn't the coming if not continued recession been well covered up. Frankly, has Bush ever needed allowance to do anything?
2007-11-16 22:18:15 · answer #2 · answered by HappyGoLucky 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
??? I think all former presidents have that right when setting up presidential libraries.
It has nothing to do with censoring.
You have a personal library at your house, maybe? I know I do. And I pick and choose what goes into my library... it's not censoring, it's me picking and choosing what I want in MY library.
2007-11-16 22:07:46 · answer #3 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why not, we seem to be allowing the Horny Hillbilly free reign over what COMES OUT of his Presidential Library, or is this Clinton's way of censoring history?
2007-11-16 22:57:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He has already censored his papers. He has that presidential privelege thing. He is the most secretive president in history!
2007-11-16 23:20:36 · answer #5 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
After 7 years and counting, who's going to stop him? A democrat congress? Dont make me laugh.
2007-11-16 22:22:13 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush does not have anything to do with history, as a matter of fact, He IS history!
2007-11-16 22:05:45 · answer #7 · answered by sea link2 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Trying saying No to Bush and he'll send u over to Iraq for good.
2007-11-16 22:05:18 · answer #8 · answered by chasen54 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Do you want to be 'the one' to tell him that he can't do and what he can do.
He can do whatever he wants at the moment.
Like he does in the Middle Eastern Countries.
2007-11-16 22:11:19 · answer #9 · answered by noknojon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
except the ones sandy berger took
2007-11-16 22:16:28 · answer #10 · answered by Mr Clean 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋