Dont everyone agree? things dont look to fake in TNA like WWE. i do think that majority of TNA stars can beat WWE stars in a no DQ
2007-11-16 18:06:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Um, so you really think AJ Styles could pound Kevin Nash into a corner? You really think Dustin Runnels could beat up anyone? You really think Kurt Angle would sit there and let Kaz use the Flux Capacitor on him?
It looks just as SCRIPTED as the WWE.
You're entitled to your opinion, but your opinion is wrong.
2007-11-16 19:34:07 · answer #1 · answered by . . . . . . . 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are 50% right
TNA got more talent than WWE (Angle is enough)
You can watch more high class wrestling on TNA
about the fake thing I think all wrestling today looks too fake in TNA & WWE (the canadian destroyer is an enough reason?)
TNA stars maybe more skilled and more fun to watch,I think no one on TNA can beat the power of Taker, Batista(sucks), Lashley(sucks).... especially in a no DQ match! except for Angle
When it comes to things away from wrestling WWE is ahead by miles
2007-11-16 20:41:05 · answer #2 · answered by OreSlayer 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree that TNA puts on much better matches than the WWE anymore. The WWE matches are set up by road agents that used to set up WCW matches towards the end. And look how boring the WCW matches were in the end.
2007-11-16 19:39:40 · answer #3 · answered by komets.geo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
properly heres the element. wwe have gr8 wrestlers yet there imaginative crew continually fail to create wonderful matches for the duration of raw, ecw, and smackdown. yet they do throw up the surprising spectacular experience at a ppv that may beat the tna/roh significant experience any day yet on a consitent foundation , tna. quickly And furious matches there large yet wwe are supeirior in another branch
2016-10-24 09:27:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
tna puts up better stuff than wwe. in wwe you will see someone in rest holds for nearly 40% of the match, while in tna the action in fast paced, and little time spent on rest holds. even for the women's division, tna bothers to showcase some good matches, unlike wwe.
2007-11-17 01:38:09 · answer #5 · answered by Austin Kingston Styles 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah TNA is fake also. But you can't expect wrestlers to make it look to real or an accident could happen.
2007-11-16 18:26:29 · answer #6 · answered by Raw is Jericho 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well now that wwe looks like there in bad shape i think yea cuz AJ Styles could handle Kane Shelton Hardcore holly
2007-11-16 18:19:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
WWE=More Entertainment
TNA=More Wrestling
I watch and love both.
2007-11-16 20:58:11 · answer #8 · answered by Y2Jericho 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
star for you.
TNA IS THE BEST WE DONT HAVE ANY OVERRATED GUYS OVER THERE,JUST NAME ONE WRESTLER IN TNA WITH NO TALENT,YOU CANT EVEN WOMEN CAN WRESTLER,I THINK TNA ROCKS,IF ONLY KURT GIVES THE TITLE TO SOMEONE ELSE LIKE ABYSS,AJ STYLES OR STING
2007-11-16 19:54:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tna doesn't look to fake http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VE2GTi6bexY :S
2007-11-16 18:13:08 · answer #10 · answered by Bob Bobson 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋