2007-11-16 17:33:31 · 9 answers · asked by BUBBA'S OWN 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
She's for it, no she is against it, no she is for it, no she changed her mind again to against it. If I didn't know better this is John Kerry dressed up like Hillary Clinton.
Answerer after me: she is against it? Imagine that.
2007-11-16 17:36:51 · answer #1 · answered by Sparkles 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
That's a good one, but do NOT under-estimate Hillary. She has a ticket to ride with FREE Health Care. She will bring out a lot of people and she must be stopped. We have to have a strong Republican Ticket and must get out the VOTE!
Please volunteer in your state and do whatever you can to stop the Clinton machine!
2007-11-17 16:12:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
TODAY is saying she is flat out against it. Remember the last Democratic Debate in Philadelphia. She had been quoted a few weeks earlier as saying she thought it made sense. At the Philadelphia debate, she really mumbled and fumbled out a convoluted answer that didn't answer the question. Then, Tim Russert asked the question of illegal immigrants getting driver's licenses to all the candidates. Only Senator Dodd, stated he was against it. Then 4 days after that debate, she claims she supports the NY Governor's proposal. Then 2 days prior to Las Vegas debate, NY Governor Spitzer renounces his proposal for illegal immigrants getting driver licenses and Hillary supports him for doing this. (I'm sure the Hillary campaign pressured him to renounce his proposal). Then at the Las Vegas debate Hillary answered a simple loud "No!" to Wolf's question about illegal immigrants getting driver licenses. In fact Biden, Edwards, and Hillary all contradicted themselves from their prior debate responses to the same question. Only Obama, Kucinich, and Richardson were consistent in their views from the prior debate.
To Elway_The_Cat....Obama didn't stumble as bad as Hillary did. He at least was honest and consistent on his position, even though you may not agree with it. Wolf was trying to label Obama as a "waffler" so the media would pick up this and run with it. He didn't dare question Hillary about her flip-flopping on the issue.
2007-11-17 02:10:28 · answer #3 · answered by GL Supreme 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
She's settled into a flat out "No" and she'll stick with that. After last night though everyone is still laughing at Obama for fumbling the same question he accused her of not giving a straight answer to. If you find out where he now stands give a shout.
EDIT:
GL Supreme:
It's so sad that you have to have these fantasies because you dislike Hillary so much. It must really be making you angry that you can't turn on a news channel without hearing about how great she did in that debate. Nope, Wolf didn't ask her about flip-flopping. Instead he questioned John Edwards about why he accuses her of it when he's done it himself and gave examples. It was great.
2007-11-17 01:39:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
Flip-flop. Flip-flop. Flip-flop.
In her heart of hearts she is for it.
Illegals with driver's licenses will be able to use "Motor-Voter" registration to vote in the next Presidential election.
You KNOW who THEY will vote for!
YES she IS for it.
2007-11-17 02:37:05 · answer #5 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
she wanted to do a test run in new york befor she made up her mind but she is not for it anymore nor will she be in the furture
2007-11-17 01:46:25 · answer #6 · answered by gizmoee 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
she opposes it.....and i think she's right... how we supposed to ask for more money for border patrol and keep em out if we are giving them more rights
2007-11-17 01:36:54 · answer #7 · answered by Livefor2day 3 · 1⤊ 6⤋
I was wondering about tommorrow.....
2007-11-17 01:37:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
NO-GO
2007-11-17 01:45:27 · answer #9 · answered by seaching4rastartt 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋