Could someone please tell me where Hillary stands on drivers license for illegal aliens?
2007-11-16
16:40:08
·
10 answers
·
asked by
smokindoggy
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
Yes, Hillary was quick to jump on that "no" answer, lol. And Obama, in my opinion, just screwed up. Imagine--- President Obama, hmmm. Just doesnt sound right to me. But, then again, thats just my opinion. Who am I?
2007-11-18
20:26:33 ·
update #1
I think I'll extend the time on this post for as long as I can. Hopefully until the elections. The title seems to fit. There will be more about faces from this candidate. She's on a roll!
2007-11-18
20:34:04 ·
update #2
Point goes to Blitzer, who had an opportunity to question Clinton about all the past stances. He let her slide with the simple answer which is the current "no" position, and moved on. Clinton didn't get any points, we know she is an idiot, and now we know Blitzer is in her corner. The whole debate was setup to take heat off Clinton! Let's get some real debates, and some real moderators next time.
ELWAY: Why was it yes last time? What was it before that? Are you going to worry about how she followed the rules for the debate format, or get your head out of your... and for once, see Hillary for the windsock she is. Maybe you want the illegals voting from now until the end of time. THAT is the crux of this license garbage. OBAMA said YES at the end, which I don't agree with, but at least he stuck to his guns.
2007-11-16 17:37:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jen O 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Elway_the_cat, "I notice that you don't call any of the other candidates on not giving firm answers although they ALL waffle about certain subjects, just Hillary and imagine that."
Maybe because the question was about Hillary's waffling? I can tell you that a lot of other candidates waffle, but she takes the cake (Mitt Romney is a close second). I have no clue where Hillary stands on anything at this point, I've written her off completely.
Oh, and point me to a couple links as to where Ron Paul has waffled. Lets say in the last 10 years? How about 15? I could say 20, and you still probably won't find anything, but in 20+ years, I don't see it as big a problem when someone changes their mind for valid reasons, to adapt to a new or different situation. Hillary does it in terms of days, weeks, and months.
2007-11-17 16:10:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should have watched the debate last night, you'd know. They were all asked if they supported giving driver licenses to illegal aliens and she replied "No." Just "No." However, Obama, who in the last debate gave her hell about her wobbly answer, couldn't seem to answer that question himself. He stuttered and stumbled around until the audience was actually laughing at him. Point goes to Clinton once again. She had a great debate last night.
EDIT:
Jen O:
Get a clue and pay attention next time. Blitzer asked ALL of them to please answer that question with a simple "yes or no." Clinton and Biden were the only ones who were able to do so. So much for your opinion that he let her slide.
EDIT:
GL Supreme:
Such a fantasy. If you need to believe that because you dislike her so much go right ahead. I prefer to live in the world of reality. Wow. It must be making you very angry that you can't turn on a news channel without hearing how great she did. Very funny.
EDIT: I don't need instructions from you about getting my head out of my a** when you hate Hillary so much you just state things like you did here without even knowing it's not true. Take your own damn advice. If they told you Hillary secretly married a Islamist terrorist and was planning Jihad the day after she took office you'd jump on it and believe it without a doubt. Your sort of bias is pathetic in its desperation. Obama said yes, after he stumbled around it like a fool and got laughed at by the audience for doing so. He looked like a fool. I notice that you don't call any of the other candidates on not giving firm answers although they ALL waffle about certain subjects, just Hillary and imagine that.
2007-11-16 17:32:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
TODAY she is saying she is flat out against it. Remember the last Democratic Debate in Philadelphia. She had been quoted a few weeks earlier as saying she thought it made sense. At the Philadelphia debate, she really mumbled and fumbled out a convoluted answer that didn't answer the question. Then, Tim Russert asked the question of illegal immigrants getting driver's licenses to all the candidates. Only Senator Dodd, stated he was against it. Then 4 days after that debate, she claims she supports the NY Governor's proposal. Then 2 days prior to Las Vegas debate, NY Governor Spitzer renounces his proposal for illegal immigrants getting driver licenses and Hillary supports him for doing this. (I'm sure the Hillary campaign pressured him to renounce his proposal). Then at the Las Vegas debate Hillary answered a simple loud "No!" to Wolf's question about illegal immigrants getting driver licenses. In fact Biden, Edwards, and Hillary all contradicted themselves from their prior debate responses to the same question. Only Obama, Kucinich, and Richardson were consistent in their views from the prior debate.
To Elway_The_Cat....Obama didn't stumble as bad as Hillary did. He at least was honest and consistent on his position, even though you may not agree with it. Wolf was trying to label Obama as a "waffler" so the media would pick up this and run with it. He didn't dare question Hillary about her flip-flopping on the issue. Clearly Tim Russert is a better moderator and journalist than Wolf Bitzer based on these back-to-back debate performances.
2007-11-16 18:47:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by GL Supreme 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well let's see. In the debate 2 weeks ago, she was for AND against DLs for illegals at the same time, then the next day she said she was for it. Now she said in last nights debate that she's against them again. Give it another week and she'll change her mind yet again.
2007-11-16 16:59:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lev8mysoul 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
She's flip-flopped on this issue many time because she has no morals. She is only following the campaign dollars as dictated by the Illuminati directing her campaign.
2007-11-16 16:48:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by George 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think she is for it...no wait...she is against it...then again she could be ' foragnst ' it. I'm not sure...go ask Kerry !!!
I'm just a dummy.." Halp me mista Kary..I stuk hear n Iraq."
2007-11-16 16:59:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Wouldn't matter, 30 minutes later she changes her mind. I think it's called Flipping. :)
2007-11-16 16:46:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
She is doing the right thing.
2007-11-16 16:47:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
how's the surge going?
2007-11-16 16:45:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋