It's pretty straight forward. A president lead us into a war that he had to have known was not necessary and a vice president who helped him mislead the people of the united states.
2007-11-16 14:44:14 · 30 answers · asked by Charles T 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Where were the weapons of mass destruction? How was a war in Iraq defending out freedom? There were no Al Qaeda there before the war. It would have been bad for Hussein. Why are we focused on Iraq rather than Afghanistan now? Is it because Bush is covering up his failure with a diversion?
2007-11-16 14:52:27 · update #1
This is a good question. Bush seems to keep worming his way out of accountability. Did he go to the U.N. and announce Hussein had WMD's? No! He sends in his gimp to lie for him. Valerie gets outed but Bush had no idea. Attorneys are fired because they're Democratic and opposes an unjustified last minute witch hunt to help the republicans but the boss (Gonzales) didn't do it, it was one of his new guys (a new guy who's allowed to fire government attorneys). Why won't Cheney or Bush testify under oath? Clinton did it. He got in trouble but he was held accountable for a lie he told. He didn't make someone else tell it for him. Bush has lied to the American people over and over by connecting 9/11 with Iraq. They are TOTALLY (other than being a middle easern country) unrelated. Hussein had no WMD'S or Al Qaeda terrorists. So basically Bush can attack Iraq because Hussein is a bad guy? Then why not go into North Korea? Confirmed to have WMD's, kills and tortures his own people, isn't linked to Al Qaeda either, but oh wait, NO OIL! Iran is at this very moment churning out uranium and it's been SEEN!
Why don't republicans read a book once in awhile that wasn't written by Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh? Let Al Franken enlighten you a bit about why those are bad (Hint: "A lie on every page"). A newspaper once in awile might be good too. Bush has definitely helped me see the importance of education. How many of the states with a high percentage of college graduates voted for Bush? That should be something posted on yahoo answers.
2007-11-16 15:26:07 · answer #1 · answered by cdemackio 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wish it were possible. Bush/Cheney have certainly made a mess of America. Global opinion is just starting to recover now due to the hope in the upcoming election. Obama or Hillary would certainly improve our standing and influence among the rest of the world (although it is debatable how effective either would be). McCain might have a beneficial effect as well but I am less certain of that. It depends if the rest of the world sees McCain as a Bush clone or not. Bush/Cheney have hundreds of lawyers working for them so I would see it as next to impossible to charge them with a crime within the next 6 months. Unless they are hiding something highly illegal that is suddenly made public. The gutless Democratic congress can't squeeze bills through without a Bush veto so they won't have enough support to attempt an impeachment. Especially since Bush/Cheney have not been charged with a crime. Let's look forward to the next president and hope the current one can leave without doing too much more damage.
2016-05-23 22:28:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not a Bush fan far from it. He did not lead us into a war we wanted the war we wanted revenge. It should have been over by now though.
2007-11-16 14:57:06 · answer #3 · answered by Ivy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey, they found a way through the Presidents safeguards with President Nixon. If he were really guilty they would have found a way to President Bush. Bottom line is that rumors and lip service have gained seats in Congress and they will continue that route until it is exhaused.
2007-11-16 14:50:19 · answer #4 · answered by rance42 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Gravel kucinich paul nader perot carter [conyers?rangel?] united for truth elicit fear smear blacklist.
The people know too much,
democracy rising democracy now.
Rage against the machine.
Honesty compassion intelligence guts.
No more extortion blackmail bribery division.
Divided we fall.
2007-11-16 19:32:55 · answer #5 · answered by NadePaulKuciGravMcKi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, the American people are slow to react in these confusing times. In any other country, they would have already be run out of town and run out of the country, if not guillotined.
America is divided and the US citizens shouldn't be. They need to stand together.--United we stand, divided we fall. What has happened that the people have to stand up against their leaders--terrible stuff.
2007-11-16 15:07:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because there are not enough votes in Congress.
The Republicans would vote against the Impeachment.
2007-11-16 14:49:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Neither Bush nor Cheney have committed any impeachable offenses.
2007-11-16 15:01:36 · answer #8 · answered by madd texan 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Because Dennis Kucinich is not President
and Elizabeth Kucinich is not the First Lady.
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/dennis-kucinich-demands-impeachment-now-during-debate/
Blitzer: "Congressman Kucinich, You’re the
only Dem. who voted against the Patriot Act"
Kucinich: "I read it."
2007-11-16 14:47:23 · answer #9 · answered by Adam 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Even Pelosi said it's off the table. Once again,Dems lie for votes. How shocking!
2007-11-16 14:47:34 · answer #10 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋