Those who doubted whether Iraq or the world would be better off without Saddam Hussein, and those who believe today that we are not safer with his capture, don't have the judgment to be President, or the credibility to be elected President.
2007-11-16 14:14:42 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a John Kerry quote, libs. your hero
2007-11-16 14:20:18 · update #1
Sounds reasonable to me.
2007-11-16 14:18:25 · answer #1 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I don't agree one bit , While Saddam was a bad and evil person, he was NO threat to the outside world , there was a report excuse me for not remembering the name of it, but it said quite the opposite that our occupation of Iraq actually makes us more hated hence it makes up more vulnerable to terrorist attack, Also I think that the person who we have in office doesn't have any of those characteristic's you mention, Judgment - he as staffed some of the most vital government positions with grossly unqualified persons, Credibility- WMD's Need I go on?
2007-11-16 14:24:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
sure and No. squaddies and Marines could have a directive or purpose. protection stress adult adult males and girls are the final act of a decision made. My opinion is they are getting used for the incorrect reasons without directive different than retaining a definite grid. this could be a important occasion that happens while politicians get entangled in controlling wars. Generals without extra adventure than a standard soldier are in fee of issues and wait till their baby-kisser says to bounce. This do no longer artwork. seem at history. squaddies/Marines at the instant are not policemen.
2016-10-17 00:57:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was an iron-fist dictator, but he kept the trains running on time. Now Iraq is in shambles and under military rule.
2007-11-16 14:20:01 · answer #4 · answered by adrianne 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
that's a completely ignorant statement. here's one , any one who blantanly ignore the millions of deaths in africa and pursues a pointless policing on a country just for oil has not the judgement or the credibility to be president
2007-11-16 14:19:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
i do not agree, Hussein was just a commercial target, isn't it funny you never hear of Bin Laden anymore??? It's probably due to the fact that the Bin Laden's and Bush's have been in buisness together since 1973.....look it up
2007-11-16 14:21:48 · answer #6 · answered by rob2587 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The world would be better with no dictators, period. He's just one in a long line of them. If Iraq wasn't oil rich, we wouldn't be there. We aren't in Africa being freedom fighters, now are we?
2007-11-16 14:19:12 · answer #7 · answered by . 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Looks like Bush made a better President after all.
2007-11-16 14:24:34 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Hardly.
2007-11-16 14:18:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sounds like a Republican candidate statement
to me. Inane!
http://www.dennis4president.com/home/
2007-11-16 14:19:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
What a ridiculous statement.
2007-11-16 14:19:58 · answer #11 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋