Now I think that people cannot say the Wings do good because of the division there in. Look at there record against there division, its like 2-2-1... i think? Well, its not above .500. So can all you wings rs just realize there good? (sorry for asking a stupid question, i just got bored)
2007-11-16 13:45:15 · 6 answers · asked by McMoose--RIPYAHS 6 in Sports ➔ Hockey
LITY... yes, yes i am
Puck--there overall record is good.
2007-11-16 13:56:17 · update #1
Puck--right now its only 5 games in, theres still another 27 games left, i'm just going by whats happened so far.
2007-11-17 07:15:38 · update #2
Awwwwwwwwww..................
Little Moosey's upset because the Hawks have clipped his wings.........awwwwwwwwww
;)
2007-11-16 13:51:02 · answer #1 · answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No question the Wings are good but the division is still bad. Just because they rang up some wins against Calgary, Edmonton, Pheonix etc ??? Chicago seems to have their number right now. It will play out to the advantage that it is. Only 5 divisional games so far surprises me.
I still think they are lacking toughness for the play-offs. If Holmstrom or Draper go down, it gets worse. Too many Lady Byngs on the Wings. Good regular season team though.
2007-11-16 14:05:19 · answer #2 · answered by Bob Loblaw 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hang on, how can they be good if their division record is only .500? That's not good.
Moose if they go .500 in the division over the season, they stand to miss out on 32 points. That's not good.
2007-11-16 13:54:52 · answer #3 · answered by PuckDat 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If the Wings take the top slot in the league this year, I will tip my hat to your squad without question.
However, it seems to me that their current divisional record is going to become a growing concern if they don't make a better showing soon.
2007-11-16 17:23:29 · answer #4 · answered by zapcity29 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Psssh, puh-lease, that division still sucks balls, lmao see? I can still say it!
2007-11-16 17:25:14 · answer #5 · answered by N/A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah! we are good aren't we
2007-11-16 13:49:27 · answer #6 · answered by DAZzle (Doing Stuff, Since 1987) 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋