2007-11-16 13:15:55 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would definitely be in favor of the pair as front runners, but even as it may surprise you, I am a Republican and I am not all for Giuliani like everybody else is. I believe that it would most beneficial to the United States right now for Mitt Romney. With the housing market being in as bad a state as it is, we need a business minded president. As for Hillary, lets just say I am not a fan. I think if Romney can lobby enough support (and if people get over the fact that he is Mormon) he could be the next president too. Next November will be interesting.
2007-11-16 13:23:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I am a democrat but if Clinton becomes the democratic candidate I will vote republican UNLESS Giuliani is the Republican candidate then I will have to pass with no vote for president. Neither of these two should be representing America; Bush has brought enough discredit to the United States without having one of these continuing it on for another four years! Both parties have great alternatives to these two! These two talk of the experience they have that qualifies them to be president; what have they achieved. A felon spending 20 years in prison has a lot of prison experience but it does not qualify him to be the warden. Hillary talks about bills she has introduced; how many were ever approved? She will not tell you the success or failure of these bills. She has been pushing her medical plan from the time she was the first lady and she still has not obtained any support for it. She has had very little backing from either side. Giuliani says he reduced the crime rate in New York; easily done when you control the statistics. Neither of these people have the personal integrity to be a real president; but then when America can return Bush to office a second time we can expect about anything!
2007-11-16 22:13:13 · answer #2 · answered by amnestiswrong 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they are both war mongers, why do you want to see them at all? haven't the Americans had enough of the wars already? can you guys actually afford another warmonger as a president? haven't you lost enough freedom by now? your country is not run the government, but by the US corporations. Hilary is a member of Bilderberg and a member of Council on Foreign Relations, why should she care about the little people? and Giuliani is just a gigantic scumbag who's acting like a Mr. 911 while he let 100's of firefighters die on 911.
2007-11-16 21:28:22 · answer #3 · answered by little concerned 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, because both Giuliana and Clinton sought the same Senate seat from New York. With those two you end up chosing one New Yorker or the other New Yorker. I was born in New York but there are 49 other states. Maybe Guiliana vs Edwards.
I believe Mitt Romney's dad was a presidential nominee contender.
2007-11-16 21:24:39 · answer #4 · answered by Will 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with Rudy Giuliani's liberal to moderate policies, but I think he would be a very strong campaigner.
The strongest ticket -- in terms of how they campaign -- would be Giuliani / McCain. They are both liberals and I don't personally agree with them, but they would make a powerful ticket.
2007-11-16 22:10:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rudy, maybe...Hillary, does not matter. As a conservative, I feel multiple republican candidates have the upper hand on any demo-lib running for office this time around. I am saying this with an open mind, believe it or not.
2007-11-16 21:23:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
HELL NO!
Neither of these two corporate media darlings have America's best interest at heart--only their egoes. And that goes for nearly ALL the candidates running in BOTH parties.
http://www.dennis4president.com/home/
2007-11-16 21:22:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, they're both Bush clones.
2007-11-16 21:18:03 · answer #8 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋