BECAUSE THEY NEED GIRLS ON THEIR TEAM:]
2007-11-16 12:46:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As we've all figured out by now, Dan Snyder is a huge part of the problem. He can't get it through his thick skull that having the best of something on paper is far from having the best. He assembled the most expensive coaching staff in history, and it was a classic case of too-many-cooks-in-the-kitchen. He has no patience to develop talent, and tries to aim for the Super Bowl every year. That's why he's never come close. But even before Snyder, the Redskins have been horrible at talent evaluation at most positions for a long time. They seem to get the most out of linebackers with some consistency, and the O-lines have been pretty good, but other than that, it's been sad. Most of the top-ten draft picks I can remember have been disappointments: Michael Westbrook, Heath Shuler, Patrick Ramsey, Carlos Rogers... then there's Sean Taylor, who's immensely talented but an idiot. Beyond his off-field issues, he cost us a few touchdowns trying to do too much. The only non-disappointments are Champ Bailey, who's gone to Denver where he's competing for Defensive Player of the Year awards, and Chris Samuels. I shudder to think about what they'll do with pick 6 this year. If we'd taken the money spent on one bust - Brandon Lloyd, Adam Archuleta, TJ Duckett, you name it - and used it towards a solid scouting staff, we'd be in much better shape.
2016-05-23 22:07:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jason Campbell is not a horrible QB. Clinton Portis isn't a bad RB. But neither one is amazing. The Redskins suck because they're full of mediocrity and there's nothing that holds them together. As far as brilliant coaches, I don't hate Joe Gibbs...but brilliant? I am really not sure about that.
As for Carolina...I think I'll just let people watch the tapes and figure that one out.
2007-11-16 16:40:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ImmaShine 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
They haven't had a brilliant coach since Gibbs first stint with the Redskins.
2007-11-16 12:29:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by blibityblabity 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Redskins don't suck, they just aren't explosive enough. They have a good defense and a good running game, but they don't make enough big plays. One touchdown this year to a receiver? That's not enough offense. They have talented receivers, so it's puzzling that they don't have more big plays offensively.
2007-11-16 12:42:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by sgldjj 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Personally i don't think that they suck, they are above .500. They play in a tough division though, all the teams are quality teams. If Philly is the worst team in the division, that is a pretty tough division.
2007-11-16 12:36:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by AlienLanes 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i dont know but I love that they do cause when i lived up north they used to give me crap about being a cowboys fan and muh boys would kick their butts in just about every game they would play. loved rubbin in their faces.
can't stand the redskins. great question lol
2007-11-16 13:59:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they have an owner that doesn't know when to step back, a coach that was good but is past his prime, and although the talent is good, they lack team cohesiveness required to be great.
2007-11-16 12:31:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by silent_lucidity2001 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's no suck thing as a team that sucks. Now, teams can have an attitude that "sucks", there is no such thing as a team that sucks. Get a life sucker.
2007-11-16 13:32:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They dont suck completely. They just lose steam in the 3rd quarter and blow it every week. You could set your watch by it.
2007-11-16 12:33:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Black&Orange 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
when has having a winning record suck?
2007-11-16 13:13:48
·
answer #11
·
answered by Cincinnati Convect 3
·
2⤊
0⤋