Do you mean The Twentieth Century. People were very Poor and Living Together in Large Families in Slums. The People were Starving, were Paid very little Money and had to Work very long Hours, often sixteen Hour Days without actually working overtime. The Factories had no Health and Safety Regulations, and Workers were Crowded together without safety Frames on Machinery, as a result horrible Accidents. Because of the overcrowding in Slum Accomodation and Poor Nutrition, this led to Diseases like Cholera , Typhoid, Measles, and Consumption TB. Most Working Class People had huge Families 10- to even 20 Children,which led to a lot of Mortalities. This situation continued up to the 1960ties, and TB was largely Iliminated in Europe and conditions got better for the Populations. Around the 1950ties a wonder Drug was Discovered that cured TB. I think it was called Interiomycin you will have to verify this Name, before that all they could do was cut out the Diseased Part of Body and hope for the best. Sanitariums was opened in the Countryside were People could get Fresh air, as they found this was Beneficial. If the TB was not bad sometimes People were able to recuperate in Sanataria without Operations. When the Wonder Drug was Discovered it cured TB overnight. It is still around People are still getting it, some say it is because of all the Immigrants from Eastern Europe, and Especially Africa where Medical Treatment is non Existant.
2007-11-16 12:11:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by janus 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are referring to our consumer society then It would have to be the growth of mechanisation through technological advances. However as Old Lady has pointed out it is the same spelling for the old reference to TB. In which case it Industrialisation would have to be a factor as this brought large numbers of people to the cities in search of work and led to the living conditions combined with poor quality food etc that give TB the chance to start, the rising population also provided the opportunity for it to spread.
2007-11-17 00:00:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by noeusuperstate 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Population growth.
2007-11-16 12:16:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by staisil 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, she wasn't. The monarch interior the British gadget in the course of the nineteenth-century is no longer an instantaneous ruler and manager of the dominion's affairs. in reality, even the British authorities changed into no longer directing the opium commerce in China after the breakup of the East India employer monopoly interior the 1830s, and that happened even previously the Opium Wars. What the British authorities did changed into to guard the pastimes of merchants lower than its danger-free practices - and that protected their perfect to commerce in opium in China. With the upward thrust of the anti-opium circulate in Britain in the course of the 2d 1/2 of the nineteenth century, the British Parliament grew to develop into an section in which anti-opium activists clashed with the opium merchants that insisted on their perfect for loose commerce in opium. the authorities changed into unable to arbitrarily act antagonistic to those merchants because they threatened to sue the authorities if it is going to spoil their livelihood.
2016-10-24 09:04:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by homrich 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
population growth surged in the first half of the 19th century
2007-11-16 12:26:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Industrialization. because goods were now being made in factories rather than in small shops, things cost a lot less cheaper.
2007-11-16 15:16:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Industrialization -- mass production leads to mass consumption
2007-11-16 11:52:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by RT 66 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
population growth
2007-11-16 11:42:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Frosty 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Consumption of what? Or are you talking about consumption, which was a euphemism for tuberculosis?
2007-11-16 11:45:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by old lady 7
·
2⤊
0⤋