Yes we have gone too far in the name of political correctness. Here's some political incorrectness, let's call the liberal Dems, The Party of Surrender. Let's send the criminals who come here for work (the undocumented/illegal criminals/aliens) back to their countries, and let's not allow anymore communists liberal Dems to attain an office. In fact, let's send them to one of the Stan's or Iraq.
2007-11-16 10:29:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by John in AZ 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
1. The fact that you have no HEARD G-Dub say it does not mean he didn't. He is for AMNESTY under the guise of comprehensive reform and to my knowledge NEVER chastised Mexico for its BLATANT support of its citizenry SNEAKING into the United States and DEMANDING full citizenship regardless of their ILLEGAL status.
2. Yes they will try to eliminate that word because they are IDIOTS who mbelieve that you can eliminate bigotry by CENSORING any type of speech that MIGHT possibly offend someone making it virtually IMPOSSIBLE to say what you mean bevcause you are using innaccurate terms to describe the REAL issues like immigration.
3. The term "undocumented workers" is a SCAM and a PLOT to FOOL US into thinking that ALL people who sneak across the border are coming to work. They want you to believe that ALL these people are just innocent tomato pickers and dish washers.
THIS COMPLETELY IGNORES THE FACT that thousands of tons of narcotics cross our SOUTHERN BORDER EVERY YEAR. Even a cursory glance at our justice systems will reveal THOUSANDS of illegal immigrants imprisoned for crimes ranging from DUI to murder. It will also reveal that the VAST MAJORITY of U.S. prisoners are in jail for drug offense which would not be the case if we stopped those drugs at our borders.
It also ignores the FACT that since we don't know who they are ( because they came here illegaly) NOONE can vouch for their character. How can you vouch for someone who's name you don't even know??? Does the fact that they are being EXPLOITED for cheap labor change the fact that they are ILLEGAL???
Of course not. And calling them "undocumented workers doesn't either. I guess when Obama and Spitzer finish giving them DRIVER"S LICENSES they won't even be "undocumented" anymore!!!!!
We'll probably have to refer to them as "LEGALLY CHALLENGED WORKERS" lest we be accused of racism and insensitivity!
WHAT A JOKE!!!!!
2007-11-16 11:21:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If each and every person did as they might and pronounced what they opt for we'd be unfastened yet faith is approximately administration and this suits supposedly secular governments who particularly fund non secular cults even however they seem to be a swindle and element of the state dictatorship gadget. Having pronounced all this they faux that's not appropriate notwithstanding that's, and to characteristic to controversy the religion is fairly merely a hide-up for evil exploits and blatant divide and triumph over approaches, by ability of the government themselves to maintain people in debt to conflict utilising god and media by using fact the devisive autos.
2016-09-29 09:20:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never agreed with that becuase I think it makes the discussion dishonest and hampers finding a solution. Alien is not a particularly useful designator (i always think of little green men), but illegal accurrately describes their status.
2007-11-16 10:29:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's largely succeeded. You prettymuch only hear the terms 'immigrant,' or 'undocumented worker' in the mainstream media.
2007-11-16 10:29:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you don't know, you should, our President is a big supporter of the illegals, I won't even dignify them enough to add the aliens part. They are illegals in our country. Instead of pointing fingers contact your representatives and let THEM know what you think. I did.
2007-11-16 10:26:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The bleeding hearts are trying to make them sound less illegal, and it's working. The media audiences are lapping it up like Chihuahuas.
2007-11-16 10:35:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Kucinich and Richardson were like hand wringing fools on that debate. Could they pander any harder.
2007-11-16 10:24:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If you only see "the left" using framing and word choices to influence attitudes, you're not paying attention.
2007-11-16 10:26:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes, but no matter what they want us to call them, they are still the same thing: criminals.
2007-11-16 10:23:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by censored 2
·
5⤊
0⤋