What do you think would happen to our civilization if there was no money?Would it be better or worse?

Question

Do you think that the great scientists, astronomers and other intelligent humans who move our civilization ahead would stop inventing and creating things and we all lived in caves now? Or do you think they in general were born to do those things and would keep doing that even without money and our life would be better now? What about those talanted poets, writers etc. do you think they did their job because of money?

I think that it is scientists that are moving our civilization not politcians or businessmen. What you think?

Ok I understand that money are needed. The problem is not money but the governments that have built such societies where the money make of some people ailiens: they have no roof over their head, no affordable health care, no afordable education. Though note that those ppl are working for those governments have jobs and still they are like ailens from another planet.

Not everyone can be smart. And that is not needed. Someone needs to clean streets and offices. No matter what job you do you still do it and thats what most important. But even they who do their job on this planet have no house no health care no money for education. Are you Ok with that?

Answer 1

I think it would be MUCH better. I don't think people are motivated by money alone, but rather their own self-satisfaction. If we were all given the same basic resources, I think this would be ideal. We live in a society obsessed with consumerism and money. If we can eliminate this, society would be MUCH better.

Answer 2

Since resources are unevenly distributed and don't come in the form of the products and services we like to consume, then three must be some trade.

This is inevitable as a result of our evolution as human beings.

My dog doesn't have money, and doesn't trade resources or make them into anything other people would want. She just scrounges and sleeps and eats if we didn't feed her.

Without money, which would imply no brains able to transform and trade resources into something more valued by is (or others in trade), then we wouldn't be human, we'd be at best apes.

So look at apes for an example of what life is like without money. I think there is a show coming up on the animal Channel showing exactly how orangutans live, I expect that will provide a great answer to this question.

Answer 3

'No money' could mean different things. If you mean 'no physical currency,' we're already getting pretty close, more and more transactions are purely electronic. If you mean 'no fiat currency' - just gold, silver, and barter - yes, economic growth and social and technological progress over the last couple of centuries likely would have been slowed a bit. If you mean 'no standard medium of exchange' - so /only/ barter - then yes, civilization would be set back centuries, the industrial revolution would likely never have happened.

If you mean /market/ at all, then you're talking civilization falling back to a horticultural/foraging model. You can't even have agriculture without something resembling a market.

Answer 4

Since humans have been on the Earth there has been some for of 'money' or payment, even if it's bartering goods for services or using natural items like cocao for a way to pay for things, so in that regard there have always been and will always be those who have more than others even if it's just a bigger lemon tree in the backyard.

Answer 5

I think life would be better. People would be doing the work they love and even though people would not have as many material things, I am positive that they would be happier. There is always a pride when you do something that you love that contributes to society which will make you want to continue doing it. Society would keep moving without money, government, bosses... Your wealth should be determined by how much work you do, not by how much your bosses choose to give you. I think what needs to change is how we use our money...

Answer 6

a collectively as back I had to circulate to London by potential of practice. i peeked on the newstand earlier the journey, and stated each and each newspaper grew to become into headlining a foul information tale. I asked if the newstand had any stable information thoughts in inventory, yet regrettably not. i desperate to not purchase a dose of gloom and marvel that day, and searching around the faces of my fellow passengers, it grew to become into very sparkling that the saddest commuters of all, might desire to be people who've time to study the newspapers on their way into artwork. existence could be a bargain happier once you do not purchase a daily dose of misery, to start the day.

Answer 7

Worse. You need money to barter and exchange goods which is why it came into being in the first place.