English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Terrorist Suicide bombers - VAST majority are male, a very few are female
School shooters - ALL male as far as I know
Murderers - How many convicted murders are female compared to male? Not many
Torture in the world - Iraq war, Saddam, George Bush. Saddam's torture videos show all MEN torturing people.

I am male but I believe it would be better, more peaceful if women ruled.

2007-11-16 09:42:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

11 answers

They would have wars because one woman leader wore the same dress as another one at an important party.

Kidding. But at work, there are many female Vice Presidents who backstab and fight with each other over every thing. I was at a meeting where 2 women VPs who fought for control of the meeting. Nothing was done.

I don't think it would be better, just different.

2007-11-16 17:09:56 · answer #1 · answered by clayjar_azn 7 · 0 0

Women are also very passive aggressive, territorial, and unrelentingly cruel to those they do not like, I don't know that it would be better, just different. I actually really hate working for women. Anybody who seeks to RULE, raises questions of competence and motive with me. I think the best situation would be equal gender representation, participation, and responsibility. Yes, I happen to be female, I was raise that gender does not limit ability. and PMS is not a get out of jail free card. By the way Melinda Gates and Dr. Mochley's wife were instrumental in computer development. @Austin- Maybe look up Hypatia, Cleopatra, Eleanor of Aquitain, Empress Chung Chu of Korea Check into who was Genghis Khan's primary advisor that would be his wife Borte. How about Madame Curie, The female assistant of Watson and Crick who was the person who ACTUALLY crack DNA. Boudicca, Camile Claudel, Yodit Empress of Ethiopia. and lots and lots of other women who have made inestimable contributions to the progress of humanity.

2016-05-23 10:58:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

women can be just as ruthless as men, but in a different way.

If women ruled the world there would probably just as many horrible things done to mankind but a woman would manipulate and twist the blame onto the men anyway....

just this woman's point of view.

2007-11-16 09:54:17 · answer #3 · answered by Kaybee 4 · 1 0

Sorry, but history shows it ends up the same.

Look into European Queens.
Matriarchal (and very brutal) Native American
tribes like Mohawks.
etc.

Turns out women rulers have no problems killing
other women and children and you don't rise to
power by being a pansy.

2007-11-16 09:49:19 · answer #4 · answered by bark 3 · 0 1

Sure it would be. Males are wired to seek revenge, which only keeps the cycle of violence going and going.

Where you aware the American Indians had to ask the females of the tribe if they could go to war?

2007-11-16 09:57:00 · answer #5 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 2 0

There has been at least one girl school shooter. She did it because she hated Mondays. Joe Jackson wrote a song about her.

Women wouldn't do any better than men. We are human too.

2007-11-16 09:47:58 · answer #6 · answered by Kathy 2 · 1 1

Well maybe these things are all apart of being in charge.

if women were in charge they would become just as crazy

2007-11-16 09:47:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, women get PMS and are too emotional.

2007-11-16 09:53:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

YES

2007-11-16 10:17:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

TOTALLY!

2007-11-16 09:46:20 · answer #10 · answered by ♥westielove722♥ 2 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers