2007-11-16 08:46:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
By "extremists" why would I be talking about the military?
Think about the question before getting the shakes.
2007-11-16 09:20:41 · update #1
This conservative hates to admit it, but as a well educated, well versed American Veteran, Bush is the poster child for terrorists in the Arab World. He has done more to recruit terrorists in 7 years then fundamentalist Muslims have in 1400 years. The very same people that condemned 9/11 and stood up for America are killing our troops in suicide attacks. I know of NO conservative in America that is not a redstate redneck high on meth that thinks Bush and his foreign policy are good for America. Even Bush Sr. said so.
2007-11-16 08:58:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush, hands down. In 2001, there were fewer than 200 terrorists in Al Qaeda. After the U.S. invaded two Muslim countries, thousands of patriotic Muslims began flooding into Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq. Bush is the greatest thing that could have happened to the anti-semitic Muslim extremists.
2007-11-16 08:56:39 · answer #2 · answered by CaesarLives 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I can't say that Bush recruits any extremists. I can't name a time when people that supported Bush went into a crowded area and detonated a suicide vest. I certainly don't know of any supporters that plan terrorist attacks. Osama wins, hands down.
2007-11-16 08:54:50 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Indirectly, Bush.
2007-11-16 08:55:26 · answer #4 · answered by cattledog 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
thanks to this policy that is a lack of any policy recruitment is not needed radical Muslims just assume they are going to have to fight us. our troops have nothing to do with it, they serve our country and our president is responsible for where they are. GW is the one who sent them to Iraq! GW is responsible for much of the mis-trust for America from around the world not just from Muslims.
my brother volunteered for the army and served in Vietnam not because he believed in our being there but because he knew he was going to have to fight anyway, no recruitment needed . radical Muslims now feel the same they are going to have to fight the USA osama does not have to recruit them.
2007-11-16 09:09:02 · answer #5 · answered by michr 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You know the answer, or are you seriously calling our troops extremist.
2007-11-16 08:52:34 · answer #6 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
bush
2007-11-16 08:49:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
It's neck and neck...
And BOTH need to be hung by their neck until dead, Dead, DEAD!!
2007-11-16 09:04:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
tough one.if moderate muslims didn't have reason to become radical they do now
2007-11-16 08:50:29 · answer #9 · answered by tyler m 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋