Running Mate doesn't have to be running for president.
Clinton-Obama
Obama-Gore
Edwards-Obama
Richardson-Biden
Biden-Richardson
Kucinich-Gravel
Gravel-Kucinich
Dodd-Edwards
Guilliani-Romney
Romney-Guilliani
Thompson-Guilliani
McCain-Guilliani
Huckabee-Romney
Paul-Root (Libertarian Candidate for Prez)
Tancredo-Hunter
Hunter-Tancredo
2007-11-16 07:26:46 · 6 answers · asked by Elutherian 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
You may be right about Clinton and Richardson, but I really think Gore would be a choice of Obama and maybe even Edwards.
2007-11-16 07:33:39 · update #1
for Ron Paul i feel Jeff Flake from Arizona would be the logical starting point in that he is a libertarian republican and is usually voting right with Paul. but his drawback is that Arizona isn't that big a state electorally so Ron might need a guy from a bigger state, and he is also a Mormon, and we have seen allot of prejudice rear its head this year against Romney, which surprises me, but then again it also doesn't. i have herd more hatred for Mormons than that obama is black, and than there is just the out right hatred for Hillary which just makes me laugh from some of these fools that post here
2007-11-16 07:45:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Clinton wins the nomination she will not add Obama to the ticket. The more likely VP candidate will be Bill Richardson. That way Hillary could make a bigger push at the large Latino and southwest voting block.
If Obama gets the nomination I think Edwards or Biden will be his VP choice.
I think you are correct about the Guilliani-Romney and/or Romney-Guilliani tickets.
2007-11-16 07:32:17 · answer #2 · answered by Downriver Dave 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GOP: Sept a million-4, 2008 in Minneapolis/St Paul Dem: Aug 25-28 in Denver, CO. operating friends often chosen sometime after the nominee will develop into glaring and the nominating convention. regardless of the reality that at one factor the conventions absolutely meant something because the delegates absolutely chosen the nominee there and the 2d position finisher might want to be the operating mate. the idea being you have become both maximum universal applicants between activists on the cost ticket.
2016-10-24 08:39:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama/Edwards vs Ron Paul/Huckabee
= intelligent & interesting debates.
2007-11-16 07:43:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton-Clinton.....(have to hedge your bet, yeah?)
Obama-Biden......(Automatic win)
Edwards-Clinton.....(wouldn't that be awkward?)
Richardson-Clinton....(Obvious...)
Biden-Obama.......(I'm starting to come around to Biden)
Kucinich-Gravel....(Doesn't sound as bad as it seems.)
Gravel-Kucinich.....(May actually work)
Dodd-Gravel.......(Grumpy and Grumpy'er)
Guilliani-9/11.....(He'll do that regardless of who runs with him.)
Romney-Guilliani....(Not bad.)
Thompson-Schwarzenegger.....(Did I spell that right?)
McCain-that one old lady...(The one that called Hillary...)
Huckabee-McCain....(I'd vote that.)
Paul-Internet......(Sorry, I'm just getting corny now.)
Tancredo-Guilliani...(For obvious reasons.)
Hunter-Tancredo.....(WHO???)
2007-11-16 08:48:14 · answer #5 · answered by dosage_profile2001 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My top ticket would be Obama/Clark. I think that would be a formidable combination.
2007-11-16 07:49:11 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋