great point....don't hear anyone calling for his banishment.they have have as much evidence on bonds as they do on Clemens.
2007-11-16 07:15:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by mojo569 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Supposedly, Clemens name is included in the Mitchell Report and that clubhouse attendent for the Mets also labeled him. Hang in there, Roger's day is coming very soon.
2007-11-16 15:23:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Tejada was on the same report and nothing has happened with him either. The bottom line is that there has to be more substantial evidence than just having a name on a report before you go after someone. Should anything come to the surface they would not hesitate to go after Clemens or anyone else.
2007-11-16 15:18:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Frizzer 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
No one knows what names are on the Grimsley report and so far there has been no evidence implicating Clemens. I have no clue where you got your information from, but it's definitely in fantasy land.
Show me a link where a reputable source names Clemens in the Grimsley report. I dare you.
2007-11-16 15:18:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by gosuleague 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
Much as I dislike steroids in baseball at all, why is Bonds the fall guy? Punish him, sure, but what about the rest? Because they hit less HRs, does that make them lesser cheats?
2007-11-16 15:29:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Arun K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not a race issue at all. Had he not hit 73 or 756, none of this would be a big deal.
2007-11-16 15:14:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Black&Orange 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is because he is not ruining records like bonds
He insulted baseball
2007-11-16 15:42:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by devilfan1900 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
one thing to say the rocket ran out of fuel he is to old
2007-11-16 18:41:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by mr_joe_the_schmo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you ask rockets team-mates on any team he played for , they will all tell you he was the hardest worker on the team
he did it naturally , unlike BIG-HEADED bonds
2007-11-16 20:48:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by doghouse 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Barry is nothing more then a BUTT stain on the underwear of society..
2007-11-16 18:49:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋