and if so.. how come every repport say that there are a lot more terrorists today than before invading Irak?
2007-11-16 06:42:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. Wait - he made Reagan the second worst president.
2007-11-16 06:47:35 · answer #1 · answered by El Duderino 4 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Possibly it is not that there is more terrorism, just reported more often. But we can not hail bush as doing a good job for keeping most of the terrorists cells across the pond. When he as completely ignored the dire situation that his own american citizens face everyday with issues like dying soldiers(refusal of showing photos), the patriot act, (gestapo report), and other issues like our deficit, and our lack of health care(don't get me started on that.) and so on.
how can any sane person say he has done well for our country when he is continously misconstruing facts, taking funding away from the needy, lowering the value of the american dollar, and ignoring his mistakes with excuses like" they tried to kill my daddy." What a putz. so my answer to your question is a simple. NO!!!
2007-11-17 02:28:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes do believe he as done a great job. He didn't create terrorists, they were there during Clinton's reign; nor has he increased them. This is a religious war - the terrorists are about killing everyone that isn't a muslim.
2007-11-16 07:35:03 · answer #3 · answered by sorry sista 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
YES< PRESIDENT George W. Bush has done a excellent job!! The terror situation in Iraq and Afghanistan has decreased!
2007-11-16 06:59:47 · answer #4 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I simply cannot BELIEVE that there are posters on here who are unaware of COMMON KNOWLEDGE that worldwide terrorism, and terrorists in Iraq specifically, HAVE INCREASED HUNDREDS-FOLD. since bush.
Jesus people! READ A PAPER!!
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-17,GGLD:en&q=increase+in+terrorism+since+bush
2007-11-16 06:53:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
He'll go down in history as.No I'll leave it to the propagandists,they usually do a great job of writing recent AMERICAN HISTORY.
2007-11-16 06:55:28 · answer #6 · answered by mach 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no I've been saying for a while he is the worst in American history..............if not an out right traitor for ignoring the country's national security before 911!
I keep asking why was the 20th hijacker in FBI custody for weeks any the plot not foiled..........no bush supporter has ever even tried to explain it to me!
2007-11-16 06:51:35 · answer #7 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
There are? Have you polled them or counted them yourself? I take it you don't like Bush, and your lack of being able to spell simple words, represents that ilk quite well.
2007-11-16 06:49:09 · answer #8 · answered by Scott B 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Bush has done the worst job of any US President in history.
2007-11-16 06:47:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋
The more he creates, the more there are to kill. That allows us to use terrorism as an excuse for imperialism until the end of time. Since the Soviets are history, we need a new enemy to justify our actions by.
2007-11-16 06:47:56 · answer #10 · answered by Earl Grey 5 · 4⤊ 6⤋