and why?
2007-11-16 06:39:43 · 16 answers · asked by McCan Opener 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
How obvious is your question.
Personally, I would say Harold Shipman and Beverly Allitt
even though they are not a couple.
2007-11-16 06:50:35 · answer #1 · answered by scorpionbabe32 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
what approximately engineering, laptop technological understanding, prescription drugs, environmental technological understanding, area engineering, training (instructor or proffesor) Chemistry, Molecular Biology, well-being care professional, programming, Radiology, something concerning math and technological understanding. you are able to heavily never bypass incorrect with that. Even in Economics, political technological understanding, yet frequently ECON (massive money maker) or corporation, merchandising, finance, etc. And if those dont paintings out, study people and existence (animals and flora). Psychology, cognition, physique shape, social ecology, sociology, historic previous, etc. enable me only tell you, in spite of proffession you bypass with, you would be doing particularly some analyzing. extraordinarily whilst it incorporates technological understanding and technologies for it quite is an ongoing technique and is immediately advancing. continually ought to learn further and extra. best of success!
2016-10-16 23:49:22 · answer #2 · answered by ludlum 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dr Finlay and Dr Cameron.
2007-11-16 06:50:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Harold Shipman
Dr. Joseph Mengele
Obvious reasons. I know they aren't a couple &, yes, I do know who you wanted me to say.
2007-11-16 06:43:52 · answer #4 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋
I have no idea who you are aiming this question at, Is it Doctor Doolittle?
2007-11-16 06:56:29 · answer #5 · answered by Agent Zero® 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
dr crippen, harold shipman....probably not the answer you wanted
2007-11-16 06:47:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
The McScandalous McLying McConns..... because they won't answer any questions relating to their crimes... and want to sue anyone who dares challenge that...........
2007-11-16 07:02:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
The ludicrous McLiars.
2007-11-16 06:47:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=fSfVFQ0clyk&feature=related
2007-11-16 06:50:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't know - are you trying to 'hint' at something here?
2007-11-16 06:49:48 · answer #10 · answered by Skidoo 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋