i mean ... come on...
2007-11-16 05:28:54 · 14 answers · asked by ryan b 1 in Sports ➔ Hockey
Personally, do away with the OT I say...............I like ties!
2007-11-16 05:51:14 · answer #1 · answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
woah 10 minutes is actual short. ideally you will desire to be determining a million hour an afternoon if not greater. yet as quickly as I had in basic terms ten minutes, i could try this: bypass on your community music or great eco-friendly area. sprint down the size of the music or container (apprx. a million/8 mile) Do 20 pushups sprint back Do 20 squat-jumps (squat, then leap, nuff suggested) And try this as quickly as you are able to thrice.
2016-12-16 10:39:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it'll be a bad idea. More money for concession stands on food (no alcohol beyond a certain point in Ontario because of the Liquor License Act so it may be the same in other provinces and states). It'll definitely be better at the Ottawa Palladium where they have Tim Horton's there. That place makes a 300% profit after the first period.
2007-11-16 06:50:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. Look how many overtime wins there are in the league compared to how many games have gone in shoot-outs and you will see that most games are ended in those 5 extra minutes.
2007-11-16 08:38:03 · answer #4 · answered by asdflalalal 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Overtime losers should not earn a point! I think we should just have another 20 minute period for OT, sudden death. If no one scores, go back to ties.
2007-11-16 05:39:47 · answer #5 · answered by Grick 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yeah shootouts are a cheap way of winning games.
2007-11-18 13:34:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
here are my preferred options in order of preference:
a) 5 minutes of OT, 5 on 5
b) no OT at all
c) 10 minutes of OT, 5 on 5
Hockey is meant to be played 5 on 5 and should always be played as such... as for the shootout... well... don't get me started on that....
obviously, no point for losing... I always find it hilarious that the NHL decided to go to that ridiculous shootout to absolutely determine a winner and yet still reward a loser....
2007-11-16 06:08:42 · answer #7 · answered by bucky 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
i think so b/c the team usually takes about 2 minutes to like get ready and all they have is 5 minutes so wrong.....i agreee...
2007-11-16 14:49:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Get rid of regular season overtime and the shoot out.
2007-11-16 06:09:44 · answer #9 · answered by D D 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think so. I think that winning in a shoot out is not a real win...I think they should either call it a tie...or sudden death overtime...keep playing until someone wins.
2007-11-16 05:36:57 · answer #10 · answered by lahockeyg 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, me, me, me. I do. Take away the point for getting there too. Play the same game, start to finish.
2 points for win, nothing for a loss.
Here's my vote.
Sign me up.
I'll sign for the wife.
I'll sign for the dog too.
Got cats.
Pass the petition.
2007-11-16 05:38:17 · answer #11 · answered by cme 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋