2007-11-16 05:19:50 · 13 answers · asked by Neil 6 in Sports ➔ Cricket
It's unfair
Mathew Hayden has been playing for 13 years & Pieterson has just played for 3 years.
It's unfair dude.
Let's just wait & watch.
Montitude believes in Pieterson
Edit -
Who says that there is no comparison? huh
Helloo, Pieterson is the guy that sent Warny's ball into the crowd, remember.
For your kind info, Hayden was 'NOTHING' when he started cricket. He actually started cricket in 1994 but he found a permanent place in the team after that famous Indian tour in 2001.
Pieterson has rocked world cricket in just 3 years.
& records say that he's one of the fastest rising stars ever in cricket.
Watch out, Kevin Pieterson is a legend in the making.
Why don't those people compare Hayden with Sachin?
Then we will say, ha ha. No comparison
2007-11-16 06:20:50 · answer #1 · answered by The Great Montitude 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Kevin Pieterson
2007-11-17 00:42:37 · answer #2 · answered by Ω→••ΡдvΛή••←Ω 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are both great players who are still playing. Who knows the future. Hayden plays for a better team but Pieterson, seems to me to be a better player when scores are needed.
He single handed won the Ashes for England.
Hayden is less naturally talented then Pieterson.
2007-11-17 08:07:38 · answer #3 · answered by narcissus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mathew Hayden by a mile. Pieterson should never have given up on his country of origin, he is the same type of person as Hick was,a batting bully boy who when things go against him spits the dummy and it effects his team whereas Matty is for the team.
2007-11-17 05:42:19 · answer #4 · answered by Arsenal08 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mathew Hayden
2007-11-17 06:11:42 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Matthew Hayden.
2007-11-16 17:41:42 · answer #6 · answered by Mohsin 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
mathew hayden for me.
peterson is a good player but not as good as hayden in terms of consistency. at times pieterson looses his marbles when his team needs him the most while hayden rises to such occasions
2007-11-16 13:30:40 · answer #7 · answered by dracula 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well would have to say matty hayden~cant look past his experience..if pieterson got that little chip off his shoulder would be much better.but hey he is only young and i think he has a good futre in cricket
2007-11-16 17:15:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Matthew Hayden beacause he has shown that he can play against all type of bowling and in all situations whereas kevin finds it difficult to bat on turning pitches.
2007-11-16 14:50:27 · answer #9 · answered by onlyme 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
kevin pieterson
2007-11-16 21:26:26 · answer #10 · answered by Kiwi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋