OH MY GOD!!!!
2007-11-16 05:04:27 · 7 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
And according to the military, it came back worse than when they turned it in!
2007-11-16 05:09:55 · update #1
What a deal sign me up!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For the stock options that is. Bet they are using 'illegal" labor to keep the cost down. take care. Stay the way.
I thought they were charging $2,000 a bag, will have to talk with my evil stock broker.
Did a case of cokes cost $100, heck everything is $100, glad they put those contracts out for bid to be honest. Just kidding signed and sealed before the deal. You think any elected official is making any money off that? Wonder who, how greedy, I mean come on.
2007-11-16 05:13:11 · answer #1 · answered by R J 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I hope it's a really big bag. Kind of Santa Claus type bag where you can put all the toys for the good girls and boys into one bag .
Honestly is should cost a bit more to wash clothes in Iraq. It's kind of dangerous to go on the EUphrates river to scrub the clothes on the rock while people are shooting at you. On a positive point, you don't need to seperate the clothes. Their all green.
My question is why the congress is not looking deeper in to Halliburton. We know there are financial inpropriety their. What I can't stand is the Democrats are sacrificing this country to get votes. They like to see corruption so they can point it out during the election. perhaps since they now control congress, they should be fixing it NOW, rather than waiting till the Presidential election to start doing something. Tey basically taking part in the corruption when they look the other way just to get votes.
2007-11-16 05:13:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
That's not surprising. Government agencies and contractors have charged excessive fees for services for decades. A fun-fact for you...Halliburton Industries was re-hired by the Clinton administration despite all his rhetoric about insider deals during the Bush (Senior) years. Hmmm...
TO SLEW: If congress was serious about shoring up expenditures why do they constantly propose outrageous tax plans? The latest I heard was the Rangel, Kennedy and Reid plan that requires over one trillion dollars in expense? There's enough pork in there to raise everyones cholesterol level!
2007-11-16 05:16:51 · answer #3 · answered by Dan K 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
And let's not forget Halliburton just moved their "home offices" off of USA soil to get out of paying taxes.
Ahhhh! Gotta love those Republicans!
2007-11-16 05:40:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He must have taken example from Penis Clinton, who earns between a hundred thousand and two hundred thousand dollars for a lecture he gives.
2007-11-17 07:19:35 · answer #5 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well..it's the Americans that choose to pay the bill. What does the government care for spending that much when they forward to bill to their taxpayers...lol.
Glad I'm not responsible for that bill :D
2007-11-16 05:22:49 · answer #6 · answered by Jerry H 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
But what about the Cheney bulk discount special?
2007-11-16 05:12:04 · answer #7 · answered by Ginger R 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋