2007-11-16 04:35:26 · 21 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
a monkey will be better that bush
2007-11-16 04:40:11 · answer #1 · answered by yourway692003 3 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Wow. Some people really have no idea what a horrible president George W Bush really is.
To take our country to war under false statements... to lie to our people and the world about "weapons of mass destruction. He ran up the deficit after Bill Clinton had a balanced budget.
YES. NOTHING would be better than what this idiot has done. Has anyone noticed the prices at the gas pumps? Has anyone noticed that since W has taken office, we have increasingly become even more hated around the entire world?
But - Hillary won't do "nothing". She's going to reform healthcare - her strength and one of the country's greatest problems. She'll find a way to get us our of the war. She'll balance the budget.
W's a freakin' idiot.
2007-11-16 06:24:40 · answer #2 · answered by Ann 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When is everyone gonna learn that that the true power lies not with the President, but with the Congress. To summarize some of what Biden said last night, if this Congress had any real backbone , they could override Bush's vetoes easily. The only reason they did override one of his vetoes is because it benefits their state and district. If the vast majority of this country would have learned that fact stated up above from Politics 101, things would be accomplished in this country. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think Politics 101 falls into a category of courses that you have to take to graduate from college or university.
2007-11-16 10:03:12 · answer #3 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
properly, i'm of the alternative opinion. no longer because of the fact she is a woman yet because of the fact she is the least qualified candidate. Her stands on subject concerns is foggy at best. She has no strategies, no information. She is only a junior senator and meets the positions minimum standards. might you communicate approximately Mrs. Bush had she been a senator? no longer in all likelihood. And only what has she completed in her tenure as Senator? Little worth of presidential aspirations. Her failure at well-being care, 8 years worth. Her close association with him is sufficient for me on my own. And we've back marketing campaign contributions and an on going saga of planted questions in audiences... Now becoming into different proper issues. This with the aid of itself stands as an emblem of her ethical integrity. Had this been completed in a community small election, say Sheriff or County Board Member, she could have been rapidly bumped off. Forgiveness ? i want a President that stands against terrorism, no longer forgives and strikes on. Bush could be obdurate in his judgements, could be obdurate in his stand against terrorism. yet, he has ethics. we are prevailing in Iraq. examine the information recently. Bush = suborn (specific) Hillary = low standards of ethics. (undesirable)
2016-10-16 23:34:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do nothing? Hilary couldn't do worse if she tried to. Really. What would she have to do?
Turn a trillion dollar surplus into the biggest deficit and foreign debt in US history?
Drag us into an intractible and unnecessary war at a cost of $3,000,000,000,000 (to date)?
Turn the biggest moment of unified international support for the US into nearly unified contempt for us?
She could burn the Whitehouse to the ground, fill the Grand Canyon with used cat litter and personally kick me in the gonads, and she still be a better president than Bush by a landslide.
2007-11-16 04:48:40 · answer #5 · answered by Archduke Gumbercules 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
if she gets nothing done she at least won't get us blown up, and ruin the healthcare system even more.
If she can get as low of an unemployment rate under 5%
keep the economy up after 2 major disasters
do something with education
than she is only tied with Bush.
2007-11-16 04:38:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
She doesn't have to do anything, she will have a four year grace period that everyone will still blame President Bush. Unlike his term where anything that happened bad was his fault from day one.
2007-11-16 04:39:52 · answer #7 · answered by rance42 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Bill Clinton's legacy is that he did exactly what he should have done while president. Nothing.
Hillary tried to do something in those years, health care.
It was that administration's most profound failure.
I'm afraid she has not learned from that. She will try something again and it will be as profound.
I would prefer the suspended animation Bill provided.
2007-11-16 04:41:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
If she gets elected, it will only show that the voting system in this country is more rigged than any previous allegations have led us to believe.
2007-11-16 04:43:48 · answer #9 · answered by ryan c 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely. Bush may have acted, but he acted immorally, illegally and in ways that were harmful to the country. Non-action is better than that.
2007-11-16 04:44:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
theres no way she can do nothing, shes got alot of work ahead of her. look at bush he didnt have anything to do so he started a war.
2007-11-16 05:12:15 · answer #11 · answered by smarternow 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋